Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313813›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2022

Tuning and external validation of an adult congenital heart disease risk prediction model.

Laurie W Geenen, Alexander R Opotowsky, Cara Lachtrupp, Vivan J M Baggen, Sarah Brainard, Michael J Landzberg, David van Klaveren, Hester F Lingsma, Eric Boersma, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laurie W GeenenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0113-2801
Alexander R OpotowskyDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-2281
Cara LachtruppDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7047-8398
Vivan J M BaggenDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sarah BrainardDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-8095
Michael J LandzbergDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David van KlaverenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eric BoersmaDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2559-7128
Jolien W Roos-HesselinkDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6770-3830

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR002541 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2018 to 2022
$93.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAdequate risk prediction can optimize the clinical management in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). We aimed to update and subsequently validate a previously developed ACHD risk prediction model. METHODS AND

resultsA prediction model was developed in a prospective cohort study including 602 moderately or severely complex ACHD patients, enrolled as outpatients at a tertiary centre in the Netherlands (2011-2013). Multivariable Cox regression was used to develop a model for predicting the 1-year risks of death, heart failure (HF), or arrhythmia (primary endpoint). The Boston ACHD Biobank study, a prospectively enrolled cohort (n = 749) of outpatients who visited a referral centre in Boston (2012-2017), was used for external validation. The primary endpoint occurred in 153 (26%) and 191 (28%) patients in the derivation and validation cohorts over median follow-up of 5.6 and 2.3 years, respectively. The final model included 5 out of 14 pre-specified predictors with the following hazard ratios; New York Heart Association class ≥II: 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-2.90], cardiac medication 2.52 (95% CI 1.72-3.69), ≥1 reintervention after initial repair: 1.56 (95% CI 1.09-2.22), body mass index: 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.07), log2 N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (pmol/L): 1.48 (95% CI 1.32-1.65). At external validation, the model showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.83) and excellent calibration (calibration-in-the-large = -0.002; calibration slope = 0.99).

conclusionThese data support the validity and applicability of a parsimonious ACHD risk model based on five readily available clinical variables to accurately predict the 1-year risk of death, HF, or arrhythmia. This risk tool may help guide appropriate care for moderately or severely complex ACHD.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalHeart FailureAdultCohort StudiesHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesAdult congenital heart diseaseBiobankCohort studyExternal validationNT-proBNPPrediction modelPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID33313813
PMCPMC8728026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.