ArticleJournal of medical entomology2021
Discovery and Surveillance of Tick-Borne Pathogens.
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Next-generation sequencing in tick-borne apicomplexan parasites: approaches for Theileria and Babesia, a systematic review.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Pooled it
- Global trends in tick research: a comprehensive visualization and bibliometric study (2015-2024).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Environmental and ecological factors affecting tick infestation in wild birds of the Americas.Parasitology research · 2024Pooled it
- Metagenomic surveillance of tick-borne pathogens and microbiomes in Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Bacterial communities in Thai ticks: revealing geographical and methodological gaps in surveillance-a 25-year scoping review.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Review
- Meta-transcriptomic characterization reveals viral species with zoonotic potential in Rhipicephalus microplus and Haemaphysalis bispinosa ticks in Pakistan.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the detection capabilities of nanopore sequencing for Borrelia burgdorferi detection in blacklegged ticks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigation and Correlation Analysis of Pathogens Carried by Ticks and Cattle in Tumen River Basin, China.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Sexual and regional differences in the microbiome and functional metagenome of the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Identification of tickborne pathogens in cattle and sheep ticks from Kyrgyzstan using next-generation sequencing.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Temporal Dynamic Interplay of Mouse Proteome during ProtozoanJournal of proteome research · 2025Article
- A NovelPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An integrated surveillance in Zhejiang Province: ecological and pathogen survey of vectors and reservoir hosts in 2024.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Differential impact of spotted fever groupFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Distribution and diversity of ticks determined by environmental factors in Ningxia, China.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- DNA Barcoding Using 18S rRNA Gene Fragments for Identification of Tick-Borne Protists in Ticks in the Republic of Korea.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- 16S rRNA metabarcoding for the identification of tick-borne bacteria in ticks in the Republic of Korea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- 2024 taxonomy update for the family Circoviridae.Archives of virology · 2024Review
- Hard Ticks as Vectors: The Emerging Threat of Tick-Borne Diseases in India.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the past 30 yr molecular assays have largely supplanted classical methods for detection of tick-borne agents. Enhancements provided by molecular assays, including speed, throughput, sensitivity, and specificity, have resulted in a rapid increase in the number of newly characterized tick-borne agents. The use of unbiased high throughput sequencing has enabled the prompt identification of new pathogens and the examination of tick microbiomes. These efforts have led to the identification of hundreds of new tick-borne agents in the last decade alone. However, little is currently known about the majority of these agents beyond their phylogenetic classification. Our article outlines the primary methods involved in tick-borne agent discovery and the current status of our understanding of tick-borne agent diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.