Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313583›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2020

The Effect of Intravesical Diluted Bupivacaine on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Young and Middle-Aged Male Patients During Postanaesthetic Recovery.

Alireza Pournajafian, Mohammad Reza Ghodraty, Shora Shafighnia, Faranak Rokhtabnak, Ali Khatibi, Sina Tavoosian, Mansoureh Ghayoomi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alireza PournajafianDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-3713
Mohammad Reza GhodratyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0062-8562
Shora ShafighniaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-8789
Faranak RokhtabnakDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6368-9931
Ali KhatibiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0679-0499
Sina TavoosianDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0510-5138
Mansoureh GhayoomiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Firoozgar Hospital. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-321X
Firoozgar General Hospital · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCatheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) that manifests as agitation and bladder hyperactivity is a common problem in young male patients. Local anaesthetics are typically recommended for this problem. Hence, this study was conducted to determine the effect of intravesical diluted bupivacaine on CRBD in young male patients during postanaesthetic recovery.

methodsThis double-blinded randomised clinical trial included 68 consecutive patients, aged 20-60 years, who underwent urinary catheterisation during surgery and anaesthesia at a university hospital during 2017-2018. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 50 ml of intravesical diluted (0.2%) bupivacaine (n=37) or normal saline (n=31). The incidence and severity of CRBD were then evaluated in PACU and compared between the two groups.

resultsIn this study, 16.2% of patients in the bupivacaine group and 83.9% in the saline group had discomfort at arrival in the recovery room, exhibiting a significant intergroup difference (p=0.0001). Moreover, after 15-20 min, the incidence of CRBD was 16.2% and 90.3% in the bupivacaine and normal saline groups, respectively, which again demonstrated a significant statistical difference (p=0.0001). In addition, the severity of CRBD was lower in the bupivacaine group, during both periods (p=0.005). The saline group reported significantly higher use of pethidine and midazolam (p=0.005).

conclusionIt may be concluded that intravesical diluted bupivacaine can significantly decrease the incidence and severity of CRBD in young male patients during recovery from anaesthesia. Therefore, the use of this method is highly recommended.

Indexed as

Bupivacainemaleurinary bladderurinary catheters

Identifiers

PMID33313583
PMCPMC7720825
OpenAlexW3007244001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.