Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313477›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2020

White Blood Cell Count and Risk of Incident Lung Cancer in the UK Biobank.

Jason Y Y Wong, Bryan A Bassig, Erikka Loftfield, Wei Hu, Neal D Freedman, Bu-Tian Ji, Paul Elliott, Debra T Silverman, Stephen J Chanock, Nathaniel Rothman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. White Blood Cell Count, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Incident Cancer in the UK Biobank.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jason Y Y WongDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Bryan A BassigDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Erikka LoftfieldDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3573-8748
Wei HuDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Neal D FreedmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Bu-Tian JiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Paul ElliottFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-5684
Debra T SilvermanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Stephen J ChanockDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-3393
Nathaniel RothmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Qing LanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe contribution of measurable immunological and inflammatory parameters to lung cancer development remains unclear, particularly among never smokers. We investigated the relationship between total and differential white blood cell (WBC) counts and incident lung cancer risk overall and among subgroups defined by smoking status and sex in the United Kingdom (UK).

methodsWe evaluated 424 407 adults aged 37-73 years from the UK Biobank. Questionnaires, physical measurements, and blood were administered and collected at baseline in 2006-2010. Complete blood cell counts were measured using standard methods. Lung cancer diagnoses and histological classifications were obtained from cancer registries. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals of incident lung cancer in relation to quartiles (Q) of total WBC and subtype-specific counts, with Q1 as the reference.

resultsThere were 1493 incident cases diagnosed over an average 7-year follow-up. Overall, the highest quartile of total WBC count was statistically significantly associated with elevated lung cancer risk (HR

conclusionsElevated WBCs could potentially be one of many important markers for increased lung cancer risk, especially among never-smoking women and ever-smoking men.

Identifiers

PMID33313477
PMCPMC7083262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.