Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313464›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2020

Compression stockings to prevent postthrombotic syndrome: Literature overview and presentation of the CELEST trial.

Jean-Philippe Galanaud, Céline Genty-Vermorel, Carole Rolland, Alexa Comte, Pierre Ouvry, Isabelle Bertaina, François Verrière, Jean-Luc Bosson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06046807 (Determine the Proportion of Patients With Disabling Post Thrombotic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06046807 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Determine the Proportion of Patients With Disabling Post Thrombotic Syndrome (Moderate or Severe) in the Long Term Within the Cohort of Patients Who Participated in the Trial CELEST Therapy.

TypeobservationalSponsorLaboratoires InnotheraRan2023 to 2023Enrolled288ConditionsPost Thrombotic SyndromeArmsPhone call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Philippe GalanaudDepartment of Vascular Medicine Montpellier University Hospital Montpellier France.
Céline Genty-VermorelDepartment of Public Health University Grenoble Alpes CNRS Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital TIMC-IMAG F38000 Grenoble France.
Carole RollandDepartment of Public Health University Grenoble Alpes CNRS Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital TIMC-IMAG F38000 Grenoble France.
Alexa ComteDepartment of Public Health University Grenoble Alpes CNRS Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital TIMC-IMAG F38000 Grenoble France.
Pierre OuvryVascular Medicine Physician St Aubin sur Scie France.
Isabelle BertainaLaboratoires Innothera Arcueil France.
François VerrièreLaboratoires Innothera Arcueil France.
Jean-Luc BossonDepartment of Public Health University Grenoble Alpes CNRS Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital TIMC-IMAG F38000 Grenoble France.
Innothera (France) · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CATranslational Innovation in Medicine and Complexity · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a burdensome and costly complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that develops in 20%-40% of patients within 2 years after proximal DVT. In the absence of effective curative treatment, management of PTS relies on its prevention after DVT. The effectiveness of elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent PTS is uncertain. We present an overview of published studies assessing the efficacy of ECS to prevent PTS and present the protocol for the CELEST clinical trial. While previous open-label randomized trials have reported a 50% risk reduction in PTS in patients treated with >30 mm Hg ankle pressure ECS, a large double-blind trial reported no effect of ECS. We discuss the main potential limitations of these trials, including a placebo effect and suboptimal compliance to ECS. We present the protocol of the CELEST double-blind randomized trial comparing 2 years of high strength (ankle pressure 35 mm Hg) versus lower strength (ankle pressure 25 mm Hg) ECS in the prevention of PTS after a first acute symptomatic, unilateral, proximal DVT. The use of lower-strength ECS than that used in previous studies should favor compliance. CELEST may provide important evidence about the efficacy of ECS in the prevention of PTS after DVT. The results will be interpreted in the light of results from recent clinical trials assessing ECS for PTS prevention that reported that the duration of ECS use should be tailored to the individual, if ECS are efficacious in the prevention of PTS.

Indexed as

clinical trialcompression stockingsdeep vein thrombosispostthrombotic syndromevenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID33313464
PMCPMC7695566
OpenAlexW3096066150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.