Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313450›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2021

3D bioprinting of a biomimetic meniscal scaffold for application in tissue engineering.

Zhou Jian, Tian Zhuang, Tian Qinyu, Peng Liqing, Li Kun, Luo Xujiang, Wang Diaodiao, Yang Zhen, Jiang Shuangpeng, Sui Xiang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Three-dimensional-printed shape-memory composite scaffold for meniscus repair.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Construction of a novel tissue engineered meniscus scaffold based on low temperature deposition three-dimenisonal printing technology].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhou JianMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Tian ZhuangMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Tian QinyuMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Peng LiqingMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Li KunMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Luo XujiangMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Wang DiaodiaoDepartment of Joint Surgery, Peking University Ninth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yang ZhenMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jiang ShuangpengMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Sui XiangMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Huang JingxiangMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Liu ShuyunMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Hao LiboMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Tang PeifuMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yao QiDepartment of Joint Surgery, Peking University Ninth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Guo QuanyiMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNPeking University · CNBeijing Shijitan Hospital · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate biomimetic scaffolds created via 3D bioprinting are promising methods for treating damaged menisci. However, given the unique anatomical structure and complex stress environment of the meniscus, many studies have adopted various techniques to take full advantage of different materials, such as the printing combined with infusion, or electrospining, to chase the biomimetic meniscus, which makes the process complicated to some extent. Some researchers have tried to tackle the challenges only by 3D biopringting, while its alternative materials and models have been constrained. In this study, based on a multilayer biomimetic strategy, we optimized the preparation of meniscus-derived bioink, gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)/meniscal extracellular matrix (MECM), to take printability and cytocompatibility into account together. Subsequently, a customized 3D bioprinting system featuring a dual nozzle + multitemperature printing was used to integrate the advantages of polycaprolactone (PCL) and meniscal fibrocartilage chondrocytes (MFCs)-laden GelMA/MECM bioink to complete the biomimetic meniscal scaffold, which had the best biomimetic features in terms of morphology and components. Furthermore, cell viability, mechanics, biodegradation and tissue formation in vivo were performed to ensure that the scaffold had sufficient feasibility and functionality, thereby providing a reliable basis for its application in tissue engineering.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingMeniscusScaffoldTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33313450
PMCPMC7711190
OpenAlexW3110439279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.