Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313410›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2020

Bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis: A meta-analysis.

Ping Liang, Yu-Dong Wang, Zong-Min Wei, Qi-Jun Deng, Tong Xu, Jiang Liu, Na Luo, Juan Hou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Bevacizumab improved prognosis for advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis receiving cerebral radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ping LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 169, Tianshan Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Yu-Dong WangDepartment of Oncology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Zong-Min WeiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 169, Tianshan Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Qi-Jun DengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 169, Tianshan Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Tong XuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 169, Tianshan Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Jiang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 169, Tianshan Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Na LuoDepartment of Science and Technology, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
Juan HouDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 169, Tianshan Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China.
Hebei Medical University · CNFourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM) by performing meta-analyses of response and survival indices. Seventeen studies were included. BEV treatment was associated with a lower new BM incidence (hazard ratio: 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14, 0.46]) during follow-up. Disease control rate (DCR) of BEV-treated patients with BM was 91% [95% CI: 85, 95]. However, intracranial DCR was relatively higher (94% [95% CI: 87, 98]) than extracranial DCR (86% [95% CI: 74, 96]). DCR of NSCLC patients with BM was significantly better with BEV than with control therapies (odds ratio: 2.71 [95% CI: 1.26, 5.86],

Indexed as

bevacizumabbrain metastasisefficacyNSCLCsafety

Identifiers

PMID33313410
PMCPMC7706125
OpenAlexW3040948138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.