Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313349›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2020

Evaluation of Diagnostic Precision of Ultrasound for Rotator Cuff Disorders in Patients with Shoulder Pain.

Behzad Aminzadeh, Samane Najafi, Ali Moradi, Bita Abbasi, Donya Farrokh, Maryam Emadzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Behzad AminzadehDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Samane NajafiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ali MoradiOrthopedics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Bita AbbasiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Donya FarrokhDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Maryam EmadzadehClinical Research Development Unit, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRotator cuff disorders are a leading cause of shoulder symptoms. Accurate imaging, detecting the type of the involved muscle, and severity of the injury have important effects on the choice of treatment. Accordingly, the current study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff disorders in patients suffering from shoulder pain and to explore the precision of ultrasound in determining the exact dimensions of a tear in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsThis prospective research was performed on patients clinically suspected of rotator cuff tendinopathy. An ultrasound of the shoulder was initially performed for the candidates. In this study, MRI was regarded as the modality of choice for examining the images of shoulder disorders. The European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) guidelines were used to design the protocols and implement imaging measures. Based on the reference standard of MRI, the specificity and sensitivity as well as positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound in detection of rotator cuff disorders were calculated.

resultsA total of48 patients (22 women, 23 dominant right hands) with an average age of 51.6±8.3 years were enrolled in this study. Based on MRI findings, rotator cuff disorders were detected in 43 patients (89.5%). The most commonly observed disorders were partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (n=17, 35.4%), full-thickness rotator cuff tear (n=16, 33.3%), and tendinopathy (n=10, 20.8%). Among rotator cuff disorders, the highest sensitivity of ultrasound was observed in the detection of full-thickness tear (93.7%) and rotator cuff tendinopathy (90%). The highest specificity was found in the detection of full-thickness rotator cuff tear (100%) and partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (96.7%).

conclusionBased on our findings, ultrasound could be considered as a high-quality diagnostic tool to rule in partial and full-thickness rotator cuff tears and rule out the rotator cuff pathologies.

Indexed as

iagnostic accuracyotator cuffUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33313349
PMCPMC7718561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.