Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313295›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020

The role of lens extraction in glaucoma management.

Jolly L Tsui, Noel C Chan, Clement C Tham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jolly L TsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Noel C ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Clement C ThamDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataract extraction has become a much safer procedure with the development of phacoemulsification, extending its application in ocular conditions such as glaucoma for better disease control. This review aims at summarizing the effect of lens extraction with or without combined glaucoma surgeries in different types of glaucoma and describing the intraoperative techniques and changes of glaucoma care postoperatively. A comprehensive literature search was performed through Medline and PubMed, and 67 studies were selected for this review. In primary angle closure (PAC) diseases, studies have revealed significant intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication requirement reduction after lens extraction. Fewer studies described its application in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT), but literature available suggests that it can also lead to better disease control. Likewise, lower postoperative IOP and pressure fluctuations have been shown in normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Advanced glaucoma, shallow anterior chamber and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) are three difficult scenarios that are commonly encountered in cataract operations. Special techniques in preventing complications such as wipe out phenomenon are depicted. Goniosynechialysis, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and trabecular microbypass stents are a few of the popular choices of glaucoma procedures that can be performed concomitantly with phacoemulsification but evidence of their efficacy needs to be further verified. Cataract operation can improve visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer examination parameters and it is advised to set new baselines after the surgery for subsequent progression monitoring. Clearance of an optically significant cataract results in better quality of life, and with detailed and thorough explanation of the indications, expectations and risks of the surgery, cataract extraction could be considered even in cases of advanced glaucoma.

Indexed as

Cataract extractionglaucomaintraocular pressure (IOP)phacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID33313295
PMCPMC7729306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.