ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020
A narrative review of intraocular lens opacifications: update 2020.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized multicenter trial to assess posterior capsule opacification and glistenings in two hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Dendrimer Nanogels with Built-in Free Radical Scavenging Enable Efficient Topical Delivery of a Hydrophilic Antioxidant to Restore Lens Redox Balance for Cataract Treatment.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Cell Calcification Models and Their Implications for Medicine and Biomaterial Research.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Postoperative opacification of intraocular lens: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Surgical Outcomes of Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation for Various Indications.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Indications and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange at a tertiary ophthalmic center in Northern China from 2016 to 2024.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Visual Performance and Refractive Stability of ClareonClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Surgical Techniques and Indications for Intraocular Lens Explantation: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Optical properties of artificial intraocular lenses and considerations for additive manufacturing.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- FIL SSF intraocular lens opacification after pars plana vitrectomy with gas tamponade for traumatic lens luxation and retinal detachment: a case report and literature review.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Imaging Function and Relative Light Transmission of Explanted Opacified Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Refractive Outcome and 5-Year Capsulotomy Rate of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic IOLs with Similar Optical Design: A Contralateral Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Objective Classification of Glistening in Implanted Intraocular Lenses Using Optical Coherence Tomography: Proposal for a New Classification and Grading System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Development of a standardized in vitro model to reproduce hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens calcification.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Etiology, pathogenesis, and management of acute intraocular lens opacification: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Late postoperative opacification of a new type hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The opacifications of intraocular lenses (IOLs) can significantly impact patients visual quality. Despite the identification of specific risk factors, manufacturing changes, opacifications are not eliminated. Likewise, more attention in recent studies was paid to possible new risk factors, however one of the most important purposes of the studies remains opacifications effect on visual performance, which could be disturbed in different aspects. The aim of this review is to discuss the main risk factors of IOLs opacification in particular IOL types, and its impact on vision quality. Different risk factors were discussed in the study, including the material of IOLs, the impact of the breakdown of blood-aqueous barrier (BAB), and certain surgeries that can be associated with opacification formation. Glistenings occur more often in a hydrophobic material, however, the changes in water content of the IOLs can significantly reduce the formation of glistenings. The studies showed a significant effect of intraocular injection of exogenous air or gas during Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, and pars plana vitrectomy on calcification formation. It raises a concern, as the incidence of these surgeries is increasing. Visual acuity decreases significantly after the calcification in IOLs occurs, and it usually causes IOLs exchange. However, disability glare seems to be more affected in patients with IOLs, which were affected by glistenings than visual acuity. Disability glare is associated with increased levels of straylight, which was widely evaluated in recent studies and it was reported to be a susceptible measurement to detect the presence of IOLs pathology. For future researches, it should be noticed that disability glare and straylight are more appropriate in evaluating IOLs opacification effect on visual quality than visual acuity. While reviewing the main risk factors of IOLs opacifications particular attention must be paid on calcification occurrence in hydrophilic acrylic IOLs after surgeries with intraocular injection of exogenous air or gas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.