Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313099›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Differential diagnosis of Marfan syndrome based on ocular biologic parameters.

Yiyao Wang, Zhangkai Lian, Yijing Zhou, Xuepei Li, Jieyi Wu, Xinyu Zhang, Guangming Jin, Danying Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ocular, cardiovascular, and genetic characteristics and their associations in children with Marfan syndrome and related fibrillinopathies.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Molecular Genetics of Marfan Syndrome.International journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yiyao WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhangkai LianState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yijing ZhouState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuepei LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jieyi WuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangming JinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Danying ZhengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to investigate the ocular characteristics of Chinese patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ocular parameters in distinguishing MFS from ectopia lentis.

methodsA total of 103 patients (103 eyes) with ectopia lentis from 13 provinces and 47 cities were recruited from Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, from June 2017 to June 2019. Ghent-2 criteria were used, as they are the gold standard diagnostic criteria for MFS. Ocular parameters, such as flat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), corneal astigmatism (AST), axial length (AL), white-to-white corneal diameter (WTW), central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length/curvature radius (AL/CR), were recorded. Diagnostic analyses based on various combinations of parameters to differentiate MFS from ectopia lentis were made using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsThe mean age of the 103 included patients was 10.25±9.67 (range: 3-48) years, and 66.02% were male. Km combined with CCT was found to have good sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of MFS from ectopia lentis; Km of 41.36 D and CCT of 537.32 mm were found to be the optimal cut-off points, representing a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 68.7%.

conclusionsSpecial characteristics of ocular parameters were detected in MFS. Our findings indicate that ocular biologic parameters are valuable for the differential diagnosis of MFS from ectopia lentis. Km, combined with CCT, could be used as a screening tool for MFS.

Indexed as

diagnosisMarfan syndrome (MFS)ocular biologic parameters

Identifiers

PMID33313099
PMCPMC7723569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.