Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33313070›Full record

ArticleInflammatory intestinal diseases2020

A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the S1P Receptor Agonist KRP203 in Patients with Moderately Active Refractory Ulcerative Colitis.

Heinfried H Radeke, Jürgen Stein, Gert Van Assche, Gerhard Rogler, Peter L Lakatos, Florian Muellershausen, Pierre Moulin, Philip Jarvis, Laurence Colin, Peter Gergely and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory intestinal diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. EngineeredActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The Multifaceted Impact of Bioactive Lipids on Gut Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Landscape of new drugs and targets in inflammatory bowel disease.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Emerging therapeutic options in inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  20. Targeting Leukocyte Trafficking in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Heinfried H RadekeInterdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre Rhein-Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jürgen SteinInterdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre Rhein-Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Gert Van AsscheTranslational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, School of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gerhard RoglerClinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter L LakatosIBD Centre, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Florian MuellershausenNovartis Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pierre MoulinNovartis Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Philip JarvisNovartis Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Laurence ColinNovartis Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Peter GergelyNovartis Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Wolfgang KruisEvangelisches Krankenhaus, Cologne, Germany.
Novartis Foundation · CHEvangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKU Leuven · BEMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsKRP203 is a potent oral agonist of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 1 that induces the sequestration of peripheral lymphocytes, thereby potentially reducing the number of activated lymphocytes circulating to the gastrointestinal tract.

methodsWe conducted a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of KRP203 in patients with moderately active 5-aminosalicylate-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1.2 mg KRP203 or placebo daily for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy variable was clinical remission, defined as partial Mayo Score 0-1 and modified Baron Score 0-1 with rectal bleeding subscore 0.

resultsKRP203 was safe and well tolerated overall. The most common adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal disorders and headache. Importantly, no KRP203-related cardiac AEs were reported. Total peripheral lymphocytes and selectively affected lymphocyte subtypes decreased, causing marked decreases in naive and central memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and also in B cells. Clinical remission occurred in 2/14 (14%) patients under KRP203, compared with 0/8 (0%) under placebo.

conclusionsOverall, KRP203 was safe and well tolerated by patients with UC. Importantly, no cardiac AEs were reported. Although KRP203 did not meet the minimum clinically relevant threshold for efficacy, the results may suggest that KRP203 treatment is superior to placebo. However, in this small study population, the difference was insignificant. Based on these data, studies with an improved design and a larger population should be considered.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsSphingosine-1-phosphateUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID33313070
PMCPMC7706482
OpenAlexW3081272651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.