ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports
Intentional Femoral Component Flexion - A Method to Balance the Flexion-extension Gap in Navigated Total Knee Replacement.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of femoral component flexion on gap balancing in varus knees using robotic technology: a comparative study of single-radius and multi-radius designs.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
- The impact of femoral flexion angle and tibial slope on knee gap in total knee arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Article
- Effect of Femoral Component Flexion in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Sagittal Trajectory Angulation.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFlexion of the femoral component has been described as a theoretical possibility to balance flexion and extension gap. Computer navigation has made it possible to intentionally flex the femoral component in a controlled fashion to take advantage of the same.Aim:The aim of this study was to assess whether intentional femoral component flexion is helpful in balancing flexion and extension gaps and in restoring sagittal diameter. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred and forty-six total knee replacements performed in a navigated, gap-balanced, and tibia-first technique were included in this study. The femoral component flexion needed to equal flexion to extension gap was calculated based on the navigation data. The sagittal diameter, the anterior, and posterior offset were measured pre- and postoperatively based on the lateral radiographs. Flexion/extension gap differences pre- and postoperatively were analyzed. In addition, pre- and post-operative knee society scores were analyzed.
resultsTo achieve equal flexion and extension gap, the femoral component was flexed in 95% of patients showing mean flexion of 3.6°. The sagittal diameter was restored in 89%; however, the anterior offset was significantly reduced by 1.3 mm, and the posterior offset was significantly increased by 1.6 mm. The average knee society score improved from 33 preoperatively to 88 postoperatively.
conclusionsFlexion of the femoral component is indeed an option to balance flexion and extension gap and to restore sagittal diameter in navigated total knee replacement. At present, it is possible only in a navigated technique, but an addition instrument should be made available in the future to reap the benefits of the same in the conventional technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.