Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312886›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2020

Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Harnessing big data to predict oral cancer survival.

Man Hung, Jungweon Park, Eric S Hon, Jerry Bounsanga, Sara Moazzami, Bianca Ruiz-Negrón, Dawei Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. AI-assisted image analysis ofBioinformation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Man HungCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, United States.
Jungweon ParkCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, United States.
Eric S HonDepartment of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
Jerry BounsangaResearch Section, Utah Medical Education Council, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, United States.
Sara MoazzamiCollege of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, United States.
Bianca Ruiz-NegrónCollege of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
Dawei WangData Analytics Unit, Walmart Inc., Bentonville, AR 72716, United States.
Roseman University of Health Sciences · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral cancer is the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. Public knowledge in oral cancer risk factors and survival is limited.

aimTo come up with machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the length of survival for individuals diagnosed with oral cancer, and to explore the most important factors that were responsible for shortening or lengthening oral cancer survival.

methodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from the years 1975 to 2016 that consisted of a total of 257880 cases and 94 variables. Four ML techniques in the area of artificial intelligence were applied for model training and validation. Model accuracy was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE),

resultsThe most important factors predictive of oral cancer survival time were age at diagnosis, primary cancer site, tumor size and year of diagnosis. Year of diagnosis referred to the year when the tumor was first diagnosed, implying that individuals with tumors that were diagnosed in the modern era tend to have longer survival than those diagnosed in the past. The extreme gradient boosting ML algorithms showed the best performance, with the MAE equaled to 13.55, MSE 486.55 and RMSE 22.06.

conclusionUsing artificial intelligence, we developed a tool that can be used for oral cancer survival prediction and for medical-decision making. The finding relating to the year of diagnosis represented an important new discovery in the literature. The results of this study have implications for cancer prevention and education for the public.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDental medicineMachine learningOral cancer survivalPublic healthQuality of lifeSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

Identifiers

PMID33312886
PMCPMC7701911
OpenAlexW3100935850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.