Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312820›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

Systems of Risk Stratification of Malignancy by Ultrasound of Thyroid Nodules.

Luis Antonio Rodriguez Arrieta, Alejandro Roman-Gonzalez, Carlos A Builes Barrera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luis Antonio Rodriguez ArrietaEndocrinology, University of Antioquia, Medellin, COL.
Alejandro Roman-GonzalezEndocrinology, University of Antioquia, Hospital San Vicente Foundation, Medellin, COL.
Carlos A Builes BarreraEndocrinology, University of Antioquia, Hospital San Vicente Foundation, Medellin, COL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid nodules (TN) are more frequently identified with the use of thyroid ultrasonography, and they have a low risk of malignancy. Ultrasonographic features have been established that increase the probability of being faced with thyroid carcinoma; however, individually, these characteristics do not perform adequately in the diagnosis of malignancy, limiting their usefulness when indicating cytological studies by means of fine-needle aspiration (FNC). This situation motivated the development of risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules, which unified their ultrasound characteristics, with the aim of establishing risk categories, standardizing the preparation of reports, and providing the clinician with useful tools to define the surveillance option or form invasive studies. The objective of this review is to compare the different systems developed by some scientific societies for the stratification of thyroid nodules, with respect to their predictive capacities for malignancy, their operational characteristics for diagnosis, and, to suggest recommendations for the implementation of these systems, placing emphasis on those with the best ability to reduce the performance of unnecessary invasive studies and to guide decision-making in the face of undetermined cytological results.

Indexed as

thyroid cancerthyroid noduleultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33312820
PMCPMC7727777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.