ArticleCureus2020
Diagnostic Accuracy of Sputum Microscopy in Comparison With GeneXpert in Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Implications for Nursing Practice and Implementation.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of sputum smear microscopy compared with culture in patients with tuberculosis confirmed by XpertThe Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Higher prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis revealed by Xpert MTB/RIF ultra among drug users in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of microscopic and xpert MTB diagnoses of presumptive mycobacteria tuberculosis infection: retrospective analysis of routine diagnosis at Cape Coast Teaching Hospital.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Tuberculosis (TB) is a major health problem. In Pakistan, the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis mainly relies on acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and Xpert® MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) - a nucleic acid amplification test - where available. There is a wide variation in the reported sensitivity of Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy across previous studies. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of sputum ZN smear microscopy in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis as compared with the sputum GeneXpert (Xpert MTB/RIF assay) as the reference test. Materials and methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted in the outpatient department of the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences. This study included 326 patients, aged 12 years and above, who had their sputum samples tested for ZN smear microscopy and GeneXpert during the period January to June 2019. Patients' demographic details, sputum ZN smear microscopy, and GeneXpert test results were collected for data analysis. A case of pulmonary tuberculosis was defined as a patient with positive sputum GeneXpert test result. Results Out of the 326 patients, GeneXpert detected MTB deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in 50 patients and ZN smear microscopy detected AFB in 30 patients. There was a marginal male predominance among GeneXpert positive cases. Adolescents were the least affected age group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ZN smear microscopy were 60%, 100%, 100%, 93.24%, and 93.87%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was infinite whereas the negative likelihood ratio was 0.4. The area under curve (AUC) for ZN smear microscopy was 0.800 and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed a diagonal straight line closer to the left upper corner. Conclusion Sputum ZN smear microscopy is a highly specific but moderately sensitive test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. This study recommends the sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF test to avoid a missed diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.