Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312687›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2020

Identifying the fitness consequences of sex in complex natural environments.

Catherine A Rushworth, Yaniv Brandvain, Tom Mitchell-Olds

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Seed type and origin-dependent seedling emergence patterns inPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine A RushworthDepartment of Evolution and Ecology University of California, Davis Davis California 95616.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0715-1234
Yaniv BrandvainDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota 55108.
Tom Mitchell-OldsDepartment of Biology Duke University Durham North Carolina 27708.
University of Minnesota · USDuke University · US

Funding

Molecular Causes and Fitness Consequences of Complex Trait VariationR01GM086496 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL-OLDS, STORRS THOMAS · 2008 to 2017
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the natural world, sex prevails, despite its costs. Although much effort has been dedicated to identifying the intrinsic costs of sex (e.g., the cost of males), few studies have identified the ecological fitness consequences of sex. Furthermore, correlated biological traits that differ between sexuals and asexuals may alter these costs, or even render the typical costs of sex irrelevant. We conducted a large-scale, multisite, reciprocal transplant using multiple sexual and asexual genotypes of a native North American wildflower to show that sexual genotypes have reduced lifetime fitness, despite lower herbivory. We separated the effects of sex from those of hybridity, finding that overwinter survival is elevated in asexuals regardless of hybridity, but herbivores target hybrid asexuals more than nonhybrid asexual or sexual genotypes. Survival is lowest in homozygous sexual lineages, implicating inbreeding depression as a cost of sex. Our results show that the consequences of sex are shaped not just by sex itself, but by complex natural environments, correlated traits, and the identity and availability of mates.

Indexed as

ApomixisasexualityBoecheraevolution of sexherbivoryhybridizationreciprocal transplantviability selection

Identifiers

PMID33312687
PMCPMC7719549
OpenAlexW3090791977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.