Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312684›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2020

Parent of origin gene expression in the bumblebee,

Hollie Marshall, Jelle S van Zweden, Anneleen Van Geystelen, Kristof Benaets, Felix Wäckers, Eamonn B Mallon, Tom Wenseleers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Parent-of-origin effects, allele-specific expression, genomic imprinting and paternal manipulation in social insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hollie MarshallDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology The University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1860-780X
Jelle S van ZwedenLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution Department of Biology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven Belgium.
Anneleen Van GeystelenLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution Department of Biology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven Belgium.
Kristof BenaetsLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution Department of Biology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven Belgium.
Felix WäckersBiobest Belgium N.V., 2260 Westerlo Belgium.
Eamonn B MallonDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology The University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH United Kingdom.
Tom WenseleersLaboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution Department of Biology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Leicester · GBBest Biotech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is the differential expression alleles in diploid individuals, with the expression being dependent on the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. Haig's kinship theory hypothesizes that genomic imprinting is due to an evolutionary conflict of interest between alleles from the mother and father. In social insects, it has been suggested that genomic imprinting should be widespread. One recent study identified parent-of-origin expression in honey bees and found evidence supporting the kinship theory. However, little is known about genomic imprinting in insects and multiple theoretical predictions must be tested to avoid single-study confirmation bias. We, therefore, tested for parent-of-origin expression in a primitively eusocial bee. We found equal numbers of maternally and paternally biased expressed genes. The most highly biased genes were maternally expressed, offering support for the kinship theory. We also found low conservation of potentially imprinted genes with the honey bee, suggesting rapid evolution of genomic imprinting in Hymenoptera.

Indexed as

Bumblebeegenomic imprintingHymenopterakinship theoryreciprocal crossRNA‐seq

Identifiers

PMID33312684
PMCPMC7719552
OpenAlexW3094116808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.