ArticleEvolution letters2020
How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations?
Article in Evolution letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimising realised genetic gain with low forward predictive ability across cycles for cooking time and correlated traits in common bean based on multivariate genomic selection.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- The relationship between sexual dimorphism and intersex correlation: do models support intuition?Genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic crosses reveal genomic loci responsible for virulence in Cryptosporidium parvum infection.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Temperature and precipitation explain variation in metabolic rate but not frequency of gas exchange in Fijian bees.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Crop diversity induces trade-offs in microbial biopesticide susceptibility that could delay pest resistance evolution.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Epistasis and pleiotropy-induced variation for plant breeding.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Divergence in evolutionary potential of life history traits among wild populations is predicted by differences in climatic conditions.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Evolutionary adaptation to climate change.Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Polygenic adaptation to overnutrition reveals a role for cholinergic signaling in longevity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Interplay between extreme drift and selection intensities favors the fixation of beneficial mutations in selfing maize populations.Genetics · 2021Article
- Personality variation in a marine snail and heterogeneous selection in natural populations.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic correlations between traits can strongly impact evolutionary responses to selection, and may thus impose constraints on adaptation. Theoretical and empirical work has made it clear that without strong linkage and with random mating, genetic correlations at evolutionary equilibrium result from an interplay of correlated pleiotropic effects of mutations, and correlational selection favoring combinations of trait values. However, it is not entirely clear how change in the overall strength of stabilizing selection across traits (breadth of the fitness peak, given its shape) influences this compromise between mutation and selection effects on genetic correlation. Here, we show that the answer to this question crucially depends on the intensity of genetic drift. In large, effectively infinite populations, genetic correlations are unaffected by the strength of selection, regardless of whether the genetic architecture involves common small-effect mutations (Gaussian regime), or rare large-effect mutations (House-of-Cards regime). In contrast in finite populations, the strength of selection does affect genetic correlations, by shifting the balance from drift-dominated to selection-dominated evolutionary dynamics. The transition between these domains depends on mutation parameters to some extent, but with a similar dependence of genetic correlation on the strength of selection. Our results are particularly relevant for understanding how senescence shapes patterns of genetic correlations across ages, and genetic constraints on adaptation during colonization of novel habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.