ArticleJournal of environmental health science & engineering2020
Comparison of performance and efficiency of four methods to extract genomic DNA from oil contaminated soils in southwestern of Iran.
Article in Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenome analysis of Citrus sinensis rhizosphere infected with Candidatus liberibacter asiaticus reveals distinct structure in bacterial communities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbiomes of urban trees: unveiling contributions to atmospheric pollution mitigation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Correlating the succession of microbial communities from Nigerian soils to petroleum biodegradation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The wide spectrum of oil industry activities caused soil contaminants, as environmental concern in many areas of the world. Bioremediation of oily soils, as biological approach done by bacteria and fungi, is very important to eliminate this pollution. In this study four different metagenomic protocols for DNA extraction has been tested in order to sequence and identify the native bacterial species involved in remediation of oily soils. In this regard, 3 manual methods and a soil DNA extraction kit are used. In manual protocol, physical processes including the addition of silica beads and freezing samples by liquid nitrogen, chemical methods such as treating the lysozyme, and lysis buffer and proteinase K as biochemical methods were utilized for optimal extraction. Quality and quantity of the extracted DNA analyzed using Agarose gel electrophoresis and Picodrop respectively. Then, the 16S rdna gene of bacteria amplified through universal primer for preparing a genomic library by PCR. Results showed that the highest concentration and quality of extracted DNA was obtained by protocol D which was about 135 μg/ul and 260/230 = 2.2 respectively. Moreover, 500 bp fragment amplified perfectly by using DNA extracted through protocol D in the PCR test. Therefore, protocol D can be used as an appropriate and effective way in order to study the microbial population of oily soils using direct extraction of DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.