Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312566›Full record

ArticleNetwork science (Cambridge University Press)2019

A Paradigm for Longitudinal Complex Network Analysis over Patient Cohorts in Neuroscience.

Heather Shappell, Yorghos Tripodis, Ronald J Killiany, Eric D Kolaczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network science (Cambridge University Press), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather ShappellDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Yorghos TripodisDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Ronald J KillianyDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Eric D KolaczykDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Identifying protective omics profiles in centenarians and translating these into preventive and therapeutic strategiesUH2AG064704 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2019 to 2021
$9.4M
Interdisciplinary Training for BiostatisticiansT32GM074905 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WHITE, LAURA FORSBERG · 2005 to 2019
$3.0M
CRCNS: Dynamic network analysis of human seizures for therapeutic interventionR01NS095369 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CASH, SYDNEY S, KOLACZYK, ERIC D · 2015 to 2017
$950k
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS UH2 AG064704NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074905NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of complex brain networks, where structural or functional connections are evaluated to create an interconnected representation of the brain, has grown tremendously over the past decade. Much of the statistical network science tools for analyzing brain networks have been developed for cross-sectional studies and for the analysis of static networks. However, with both an increase in longitudinal study designs, as well as an increased interest in the neurological network changes that occur during the progression of a disease, sophisticated methods for longitudinal brain network analysis are needed. We propose a paradigm for longitudinal brain network analysis over patient cohorts, with the key challenge being the adaptation of Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models (SAOMs) to the neuroscience setting. SAOMs are designed to capture network dynamics representing a variety of influences on network change in a continuous-time Markov chain framework. Network dynamics are characterized through both endogenous (i.e., network related) and exogenous effects, where the latter include mechanisms conjectured in the literature. We outline an application to the resting-state fMRI setting with data from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. We draw illustrative conclusions at the subject level and make a comparison between elderly controls and individuals with AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s DiseaseComplex brain networksfunctional connectivityLongitudinal network analysisNetwork analysisResting-state fMRIStochastic actor-oriented models

Identifiers

PMID33312566
PMCPMC7731975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.