Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312452›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2020

Working towards inclusive and equitable trauma treatment guidelines: a child-centered reflection.

Eva Alisic, Jessica Roth, Vanessa Cobham, Rowena Conroy, Alexandra De Young, Gertrud Hafstad, Tobias Hecker, Rachel Hiller, Nancy Kassam-Adams, Betty Lai and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eva AlisicUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7225-606X
Jessica RothUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Vanessa CobhamUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7633-2971
Rowena ConroyUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0805-1457
Alexandra De YoungUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-427X
Gertrud HafstadNKVTS, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1162-6861
Tobias HeckerUniversity of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-0512
Rachel HillerUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4180-8941
Nancy Kassam-AdamsUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-1428
Betty LaiBoston College, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-2706
Markus LandoltUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-5558
Meghan MarsacUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-1721
Soraya SeedatStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-786X
David TrickeyAnna Freud Centre, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-5147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines, such as those focusing on traumatic stress treatment, can play an important role in promoting inclusion and equity. Based on a review of 14 international trauma treatment guidance documents that explicitly mentioned children, we reflect on two areas in which these guidelines can become more inclusive and equitable; a) representation of children's cultural background and b) children's opportunity to have their voice heard. While a few guidelines mentioned that treatment should be tailored to children's cultural needs, there was little guidance on how this could be done. Moreover, there still appears to be a strong white Western lens across all stages of producing and evaluating the international evidence base. The available documentation also suggested that no young people under the age of 18 had been consulted in the guideline development processes. To contribute to inclusion and equity, we suggest five elements for future national guideline development endeavours. Promoting research and guideline development with, by, and for currently under-represented communities should be a high priority for our field. Our national, regional and global professional associations are in an excellent position to (continue to) stimulate conversation and action in this domain.

Indexed as

children and adolescents• Children’s cultural background is minimally discussed in clinical guidelines; the evidence base and production process still have a strong white Western lens.• Children’s voice is not yet heard in the guidelines development process.• Inclusion and equity should be high on our research & practice agenda.clinical practice guidelinesEvidence-based interventionglobal mental healthinequalityPTSDyouth

Identifiers

PMID33312452
PMCPMC7717622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.