ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
Prognostic autophagy model based on
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MOV10, a novel immunotherapy and prognostic biomarker, contributes to glioma development by regulating autophagy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Pyroptosis-Related Gene Signature Associated with Prognosis and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Gliomas.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Values of a novel pyroptosis-related genetic signature in predicting outcome and immune status of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology report · 2022Article
- Kidney cancer biomarkers and targets for therapeutics: survivin (BIRC5), XIAP, MCL-1, HIF1α, HIF2α, NRF2, MDM2, MDM4, p53, KRAS and AKT in renal cell carcinoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Review
- Construction of a Prognostic Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Immunoautophagy-Related Genes and Tumor Microenvironment.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify key autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in patients with renal cancer (RC) by bioinformatics analysis, and to clarify their potential prognostic value. Thirty-eight differentially expressed ARGs were identified between RC and normal tissues based on The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that autophagy may play a tumor-promoting role in the initiation of RC. We established a prognostic model with two ARGs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
33312383PMC7724354W3116369233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.