ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
Simplified flow cytometry scoring for diagnosis and prognosis of myelodysplastic symptom.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Approach to the Diagnosis and Classification of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes-Recommendations From the International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes (MDS [icMDS]).Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024Guideline
- Integrating Molecular Alterations with Immunophenotype and Clinical Characteristics in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Single-Center Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Immunophenotyping myelodysplastic neoplasms: the role of flow cytometry in the molecular classification era.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Multiparameter flow cytometry in the evaluation of myelodysplasia: Analytical issues: Recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet/International Myelodysplastic Syndrome Flow Cytometry Working Group.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A flow cytometric score (FCM-score) to diagnose myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) was proposed in 2012 that used four parameters to distinguish low-grade MDS from non-clonal cytopenias. This study was carried out to further simplify the method for better clinical application. Combinations of antibodies CD34, CD19, CD33 and CD45 were analyzed for the four parameters. Compared with the published method that used low side scatter (SSC) and CD45 expression to separate B lymphocyte progenitor cells and myeloblasts, our method (MFCM-Score) used CD19 and CD33 to separate B lymphocyte progenitor cells and myeloblasts within the CD34
Indexed as
Identifiers
33312381PMC7724332W3114343752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.