Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312324›Full record

ArticleCurrent bladder dysfunction reports2019

Dilemmas in Management of the Geriatric Bladder.

S M Hartigan, W S Reynolds, P P Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current bladder dysfunction reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S M HartiganDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
W S ReynoldsDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
P P SmithDepartment of Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center.

Funding

Regulatory Mechanisms in a Homeostatic Model of Geriatric Voiding Problems and IncontinenceK76AG054777 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI SMITH, PHILLIP PAUL · 2016 to 2018
$805k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG054777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this article, we will review current dilemmas regarding evaluation and management of the geriatric bladder incorporating concepts of normal changes of aging as well as common lower urinary tract dysfunction. RECENT

findingsIncreasing age leads to functional changes in essentially all organ systems including the genitourinary system. Understanding the natural changes with age of the bladder as well as the signs and symptoms of pathologic conditions is paramount to diagnosis and treatment of urologic conditions in the geriatric population. SUMMARY: There are several conundrums in the diagnosis and evaluation of the geriatric bladder including the ability of the bladder to store, empty, as well as sensitivity disturbances. Diagnostic testing and goals of treatment should be individualized for each patient and personalized to consider patient comorbidities, limitations, and expectations.

Indexed as

Aging bladderGeriatric urologyIncontinenceLower urinary tract symptomsVoiding dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID33312324
PMCPMC7731875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.