Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33312025›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2020

Comparison of the Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Open Thoracotomy for Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Single Cohort Study with 269 Cases.

Volkan Erdogu, Hasan Akin, Yasar Sonmezoglu, Ali Cevat Kutluk, Celal Bugra Sezen, Mustafa Vedat Dogru, Ozkan Saydam, Muzaffer Metin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Volkan ErdoguDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan AkinDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yasar SonmezogluDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Cevat KutlukDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Celal Bugra SezenDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa Vedat DogruDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozkan SaydamDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muzaffer MetinDepartment of Chest Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yedikule Teaching Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to compare the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy with open thoracotomy lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsThere were 269 cases with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy between 2017-2019; these cases were retrospectively studied. VATS lobectomy (VATS Group) and open thoracotomy lobectomy (Thoracotomy Group) patients' results were compared according to the length of hospitalizations, early postoperative complications and tumor size and stages.

resultsVATS lobectomy was performed in 89 (33%) of these patients, whereas 180 (67%) patients underwent lobectomy using open thoracotomy for NSCLC. The findings showed that the average length of hospitalization was shorter in the VATS Group compared to the Thoracotomy Group (4 vs. 5.5 days) (p<0.05). It was found that the mean size of the tumour was smaller in the VATS Group when compared to the Thoracotomy Group (2.66 cm vs 3.97 cm) (p<0.001). Early postoperative complications were lower in the VATS Group (n=15, 16.8% vs n=58, 32.2%; p<0.021).

conclusionIn VATS lobectomy cases, postoperative complications are less, and the length of hospitalization is shorter. VATS lobectomy is mostly preferred smaller than 3 cm tumor size.

Indexed as

Lobectomynon-small cell lung cancerthoracotomyvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID33312025
PMCPMC7729729
OpenAlexW3031042575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.