Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33311959›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Is opioid use safe in women trying to conceive?

Kerry S Flannagan, Sunni L Mumford, Lindsey A Sjaarda, Jeannie G Radoc, Neil J Perkins, Victoria C Andriessen, Jessica R Zolton, Robert M Silver, Enrique F Schisterman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The placenta as a target of opioid drugs†.Biology of reproduction · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kerry S FlannaganFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Sunni L MumfordFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Lindsey A SjaardaFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jeannie G RadocFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Neil J PerkinsFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Victoria C AndriessenFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jessica R ZoltonFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Robert M SilverObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Enrique F SchistermanFrom the Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

EAGeR Trial - The Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction TrialZIAHD008795 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI PERKINS, NEIL · 2009 to 2025
$9.6M
EAGeR Trial - The Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction TrialZ01HD008795 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE · 2007 to 2008
$596k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008795Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HD008795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opioids are commonly prescribed to women of reproductive age, including after delivery and miscarriage. However, to our knowledge, opioid use has not been frequently studied in relation to the common reproductive complications of impaired fecundability and pregnancy. We examined the association of opioid use during the critical window of pregnancy establishment with fecundability and pregnancy loss. Methods: We measured opioid use by urine screening and self-report at multiple time points during preconception and early pregnancy in a prospective cohort of women attempting conception (n=1228). The main outcomes included time to hCG-detected pregnancy and incidence of live birth and pregnancy loss. We estimated fecundability odds ratios (FOR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive characteristics, and use of antidepressants, tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana. Results: Prevalence of preconception opioid use was 18% (n=226 of 1228), and in early pregnancy was 5% (n=33 of 685). Opioid use while attempting pregnancy was associated with reduced fecundability (FOR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.0). Risk of pregnancy loss increased as opioid exposure was detected later in gestation, from the beginning of the cycle of conception (RR: 1.5; 95% CI 0.85, 2.6), to week 4 of pregnancy (RR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1, 4.1), and to week 4 and 8 of pregnancy (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 5.0). Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that opioid exposure while trying to conceive may be harmful, even among healthy, non-opioid-dependent women. Possible risks to fecundability and pregnancy viability are relevant to patients and providers when evaluating pain management approaches.ClinicalTrials.gov

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAnalgesics, OpioidFertilityAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesAnalgesics, Opioidfecundabilityfertilitylive birthopioidspregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID33311959
PMCPMC7725439
OpenAlexW3048582333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.