Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33311803›Full record

ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2020

Chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer: real-world experience in a single institute.

Osamu Maeda, Tomoki Ebata, Tomoya Shimokata, Ayumu Matsuoka, Megumi Inada-Inoue, Sachi Morita, Yuko Takano, Hiroshi Urakawa, Yuki Miyai, Mihoko Sugishita and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development andRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Osamu MaedaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoki EbataDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoya ShimokataDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ayumu MatsuokaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Megumi Inada-InoueDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Sachi MoritaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuko TakanoDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroshi UrakawaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuki MiyaiDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Mihoko SugishitaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ayako MitsumaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Masahiko AndoCenter for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi MizunoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Masato NaginoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuichi AndoDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University Hospital · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard chemotherapy regimen for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer is gemcitabine combined with cisplatin (GC). To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer in the real world, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical courses of patients who underwent chemotherapy with GC from January 2015 to November 2019. Forty-eight patients underwent the GC regimen. One patient (2.1%) achieved a complete response, seven patients (14.6%) achieved a partial response, 26 patients (54.2) achieved stable disease, 11 patients (22.9%) achieved progressive disease, and 3 patients (6.3%) were not evaluable. The overall response rate was 16.7%. The median overall survival was 14.2 months (95% CI: 13.8-14.6), and the median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.2-11.2). Thirty-nine patients (81.3%) experienced grade 3 or higher severe adverse events as follows: 54.2% experienced neutropenia, 20.8% experienced anemia, 12.5% experienced thrombocytopenia and 20.8% experienced biliary tract infection. As a second-line chemotherapy, S-1 was used in seventeen patients, and stable disease was achieved in three patients (17.6%). The GC regimen for biliary tract cancer is effective and safe for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsCisplatinDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Progression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabinebiliary tract cancercholangiocarcinomacisplatingemcitabineS-1

Identifiers

PMID33311803
PMCPMC7719462
OpenAlexW3116098973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.