ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2020
Chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer: real-world experience in a single institute.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Prognostic Factors and Survival Risk Stratification for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine-Based Palliative Chemotherapy: A Real-World Retrospective Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Durvalumab-combined chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer in a Japanese expert center: initial 50 cases in daily practice.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Development andRSC advances · 2024Article
- Real-world evidence of systemic treatment practices for biliary tract cancer in Japan: Results of a database study.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2024Article
- Treatments, prognostic factors, and genetic heterogeneity in advanced cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter real-world study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard chemotherapy regimen for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer is gemcitabine combined with cisplatin (GC). To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer in the real world, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical courses of patients who underwent chemotherapy with GC from January 2015 to November 2019. Forty-eight patients underwent the GC regimen. One patient (2.1%) achieved a complete response, seven patients (14.6%) achieved a partial response, 26 patients (54.2) achieved stable disease, 11 patients (22.9%) achieved progressive disease, and 3 patients (6.3%) were not evaluable. The overall response rate was 16.7%. The median overall survival was 14.2 months (95% CI: 13.8-14.6), and the median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI: 4.2-11.2). Thirty-nine patients (81.3%) experienced grade 3 or higher severe adverse events as follows: 54.2% experienced neutropenia, 20.8% experienced anemia, 12.5% experienced thrombocytopenia and 20.8% experienced biliary tract infection. As a second-line chemotherapy, S-1 was used in seventeen patients, and stable disease was achieved in three patients (17.6%). The GC regimen for biliary tract cancer is effective and safe for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.