Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33311710›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2021

Chromosomes in the genomic age. Preserving cytogenomic competence of diagnostic genome laboratories.

Ron Hochstenbach, Thomas Liehr, Rosalind J Hastings

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Sometimes karyotype resolves the case!Frontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  4. Tracking Karyotype Changes in Treatment-Induced Drug-Resistant Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. The New Era of Cancer Cytogenetics and Cytogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2022
    Article
  9. Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical Cytogenetics of the Dog: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ron HochstenbachAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Genetics, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.hochstenbach@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4271-9438
Thomas LiehrUniversity Clinic Jena, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Rosalind J HastingsGenQA, Level 1, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLJena University Hospital · DEJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation of clinical genetic laboratories in External Quality Assessment schemes (EQAs) is a powerful method to ascertain if any improvement or additional training is required in the diagnostic service. Here, we provide evidence from recent EQAs that the competence in recognizing and interpreting cytogenetic aberrations is variable and could impact patient management. We identify several trends that could affect cytogenomic competence. Firstly, as a result of the age distribution among clinical laboratory geneticists (CLGs) registered at the European Board of Medical Genetics, about 25-30% of those with experience in cytogenetics will retire during the next decade. At the same time, there are about twice as many molecular geneticists to cytogeneticists among the younger CLGs. Secondly, when surveying training programs for CLG, we observed that not all programs guarantee that candidates gather sufficient experience in clinical cytogenomics. Thirdly, we acknowledge that whole genome sequencing (WGS) has a great attraction to biomedical scientists that wish to enter a training program for CLG. This, with a larger number of positions available, makes a choice for specialization in molecular genetics logical. However, current WGS technology cannot provide a diagnosis in all cases. Understanding the etiology of chromosomal rearrangements is essential for appropriate follow-up and for ascertaining recurrence risks. We define the minimal knowledge a CLG should have about cytogenomics in a world dominated by WGS, and discuss how laboratory directors and boards of professional organizations in clinical genetics can uphold cytogenomic competence by providing adequate CLG training programs and attracting sufficient numbers of trainees.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCytogenetic AnalysisGenetic TestingGenomicsHumansLaboratories, Clinical

Identifiers

PMID33311710
PMCPMC8115145
OpenAlexW3113368802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.