Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33311677›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2020

Management of anaphylaxis in the dental practice: an update.

Phil Jevon, Shaam Shamsi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: National Database Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chlorhexidine hypersensitivity.British dental journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phil JevonPGCE Academy Tutor, Walsall Teaching Academy, Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK. phil.jevon@walsallhealthcare.nhs.uk.
Shaam ShamsiDirector, Horizons Dental Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK; HEWM FD Training Programme Director, CQC Specialist Advisor, RCS Examiner, UK.
RCVS Knowledge · GBWalsall Academy · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a severe and potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that can occur in the dental practice. There are a number of dental-related causes including mouthwashes, local anaesthetics, latex and antibiotics. The dental team must be able to respond effectively and manage the life-threatening situation appropriately following Resuscitation Council UK guidelines. The timely administration of adrenaline is life-saving; any delays can lead to a poor outcome. With the current national supply issues with adrenaline auto-injector devices, there is an expectation that GDPs should be competent at drawing up adrenaline from an ampoule and administrating it intramuscularly. The aim of this article is to provide an update on the management of anaphylaxis in the dental practice with particular reference to the procedure for intramuscular injection of adrenaline.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisEpinephrineHumansInjections, IntramuscularEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID33311677
PMCPMC7729689
OpenAlexW3112509613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.