Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33311555›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Symmetry prediction and knowledge discovery from X-ray diffraction patterns using an interpretable machine learning approach.

Yuta Suzuki, Hideitsu Hino, Takafumi Hawai, Kotaro Saito, Masato Kotsugi, Kanta Ono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GraPhAI: Neural Networks for Solving Centrosymmetric Crystal Structures.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Dara: Automated Multiple-Hypothesis Phase Identification and Refinement from Powder X‑ray Diffraction.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. On artificial crystal structure generation for solving the phase problem with deep learning.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. End-to-End Crystal Structure Prediction from Powder X-Ray Diffraction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. The seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction: structure generation methods.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Accurate space-group prediction from composition.Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuta SuzukiInstitute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan.
Hideitsu HinoThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, 190-0014, Japan.
Takafumi HawaiInstitute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan.
Kotaro SaitoInstitute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan.
Masato KotsugiDepartment of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, 125-8585, Japan.
Kanta OnoInstitute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan. kanta.ono@kek.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3285-9093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of crystal system and space group in the initial stages of crystal structure analysis forms a bottleneck in material science workflow that often requires manual tuning. Herein we propose a machine-learning (ML)-based approach for crystal system and space group classification based on powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns as a proof of concept using simulated patterns. Our tree-ensemble-based ML model works with nearly or over 90% accuracy for crystal system classification, except for triclinic cases, and with 88% accuracy for space group classification with five candidates. We also succeeded in quantifying empirical knowledge vaguely shared among experts, showing the possibility for data-driven discovery of unrecognised characteristics embedded in experimental data by using an interpretable ML approach.

Identifiers

PMID33311555
PMCPMC7732852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.