Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33310800›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Surgical candidacy and treatment initiation among women with cervical cancer at public referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda: a descriptive cohort study.

Megan Swanson, Miriam Nakalembe, Lee-May Chen, Stefanie Ueda, Jane Namugga, Carol Nakisige, Megan J Huchko

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan SwansonObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA megan.swanson@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-7923
Miriam NakalembeObstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Lee-May ChenObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stefanie UedaObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jane NamuggaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Carol NakisigeUganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Megan J HuchkoDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to report the proportion of women with a new diagnosis of cervical cancer recommended for curative hysterectomy as well as associated factors. We also report recommended treatments by stage and patterns of treatment initiation.

designThis was an observational cohort study. Inperson surveys were followed by a phone call.

settingParticipants were recruited at the two public tertiary care referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda.

participantsAdult women with a new diagnosis of cervical cancer were eligible: 332 were invited to participate, 268 met the criteria and enrolled, and 255 completed both surveys. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was surgical candidacy; a secondary outcome was treatment initiation. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analyses examined the associations between predictors and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine outcomes in subgroups, including stage and availability of radiation.

resultsAmong 268 participants, 76% were diagnosed at an advanced stage (IIB-IVB). In total, 12% were recommended for hysterectomy. In adjusted analysis, living within 15 km of Kampala (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.03) and prior screening (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.22 to 6.83) were significantly associated with surgical candidacy. Radiotherapy availability was not significantly associated with treatment recommendations for early-stage disease (IA-IIA), but was associated with recommended treatment modality (chemoradiation vs primary chemotherapy) for locally advanced stage (IIB-IIIB). Most (67%) had started treatment. No demographic or health factor, treatment recommendation, or radiation availability was associated with treatment initiation. Among those recommended for hysterectomy, 55% underwent surgery. Among those who had initiated treatment, 82% started the modality that was recommended.

conclusionWomen presented to public referral centres in Kampala with mostly advanced-stage cervical cancer and few were recommended for surgery. Most were able to initiate treatment. Lack of access to radiation did not significantly increase the proportion of early-stage cancers recommended for hysterectomy.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansHysterectomyNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantReferral and ConsultationUgandaadult oncologyadult radiotherapychemotherapyepidemiologygynaecological oncology

Identifiers

PMID33310800
PMCPMC7735119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.