Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33310665›Full record

ArticleInternational immunopharmacology2021

Ozone therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: Preliminary report of a prospective case-control study.

Alberto Hernández, Montserrat Viñals, Asunción Pablos, Francisco Vilás, Peter J Papadakos, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Sergio D Bergese, Marc Vives

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in International immunopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04444531 (Ozone Therapy for Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04444531 completednot on this map

Ozone Therapy for Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia: Preliminary Report of a Prospective Case-control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep TruetaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled18ConditionsCOVID-19 Pneumonia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alberto HernándezDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Montserrat ViñalsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Asunción PablosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Francisco VilásDepartment of General Surgery, Policlinica Ibiza Hospital, Ibiza, Spain.
Peter J PapadakosDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Duminda N WijeysunderaDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, St Michael Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Sergio D BergeseDepartments of Anesthesiology & Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Marc VivesDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr J Trueta, Girona, Spain. Electronic address: mvives.girona.ics@gencat.cat.
Clínica Subiza · ESHospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta · ESSt. Michael's Hospital · CAStony Brook University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is still no specific treatment strategies for COVID-19 other than supportive management.

designA prospective case-control study determined by admittance to the hospital based on bed availability.

participantsEighteen patients with COVID-19 infection (laboratory confirmed) severe pneumonia admitted to hospital between 20th March and 19th April 2020. Patients admitted to the hospital during the study period were assigned to different beds based on bed availability. Depending on the bed the patient was admitted, the treatment was ozone autohemotherapy or standard treatment. Patients in the case group received ozonated blood twice daily starting on the day of admission for a median of four days. Each treatment involved administration of 200 mL autologous whole blood enriched with 200 mL of oxygen-ozone mixture with a 40 μg/mL ozone concentration. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time from hospital admission to clinical improvement.

resultsNine patients (50%) received ozonated autohemotherapy beginning on the day of admission. Ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with shorter time to clinical improvement (median [IQR]), 7 days [6-10] vs 28 days [8-31], p = 0.04) and better outcomes at 14-days (88.8% vs 33.3%, p = 0.01). In risk-adjusted analyses, ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with a shorter mean time to clinical improvement (-11.3 days, p = 0.04, 95% CI -22.25 to -0.42).

conclusionOzonated autohemotherapy was associated with a significantly shorter time to clinical improvement in this prospective case-control study. Given the small sample size and study design, these results require evaluation in larger randomized controlled trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04444531.

Indexed as

Blood Transfusion, AutologousSARS-CoV-2AgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOzoneTreatment OutcomeOzoneCOVID-19Oxygen-ozone therapyOzonated bloodPneumoniaTime to clinical improvement

Identifiers

PMID33310665
PMCPMC7833586
OpenAlexW3111955960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.