ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2021
Conditional promoters to investigate gene function during wheat infection by Zymoseptoria tritici.
Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Asynchronous development of Zymoseptoria tritici infection in wheat.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The fungus Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria tritici leaf blotch, which poses a serious threat to temperate-grown wheat. Recently, we described a raft of molecular tools to study the biology of this fungus in vitro. Amongst these are 5 conditional promoters (Pnar1, Pex1A, Picl1, Pgal7, PlaraB), which allow controlled over-expression or repression of target genes in cells grown in liquid culture. However, their use in the host-pathogen interaction in planta was not tested. Here, we investigate the behaviour of these promoters by quantitative live cell imaging of green-fluorescent protein-expressing cells during 6 stages of the plant infection process. We show that Pnar1 and Picl1 are repressed in planta and demonstrate their suitability for studying essential gene expression and function in plant colonisation. The promoters Pgal7 and Pex1A are not fully-repressed in planta, but are induced during pycnidiation. This indicates the presence of inducing galactose or xylose and/or arabinose, released from the plant cell wall by the activity of fungal hydrolases. In contrast, the PlaraB promoter, which normally controls expression of an α-l-arabinofuranosidase B, is strongly induced inside the leaf. This suggests that the fungus is exposed to L-arabinose in the mesophyll apoplast. Taken together, this study establishes 2 repressible promoters (Pnar1 and Picl1) and three inducible promoters (Pgal7, Pex1A, PlaraB) for molecular studies in planta. Moreover, we provide circumstantial evidence for plant cell wall degradation during the biotrophic phase of Z. tritici infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.