Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33309590›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2021

Qualitative Study on Participant Perceptions of a Supermarket Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program.

Sophia Riemer, Lina Pinero Walkinshaw, Alyssa Auvinen, Jessica Marcinkevage, Mary Daniel, Jessica C Jones-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Preferences for food vouchers among adults with low incomes.Journal of hunger & environmental nutrition · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophia Riemer
Lina Pinero Walkinshaw
Alyssa Auvinen
Jessica Marcinkevage
Mary Daniel
Jessica C Jones-Smith

Funding

Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURRAN, SARA R. · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplete Eats Rx is a fruit and vegetable prescription program designed to incentivize fruit and vegetable consumption among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants via $10 incentives distributed either weekly or per encounter to purchase fruits and vegetables at a mid-price supermarket chain in Washington State.

objectiveTo better understand SNAP participants' experience, and to determine perceived impacts and consequences of the program.

designQualitative analysis of nine photovoice sessions. Participants chose the topics for discussion. Sessions were audiorecorded and transcribed. Thematic content analysis was performed to identify key emergent themes using Atlas.ti.

settingSpokane, Seattle, and Yakima, Washington.

participantsTwenty-six individuals who received a fruit and vegetable prescription within the past 6 months, 23 of whom attended all three photovoice sessions offered at their site. Participants were recruited from three participating health care or public health organizations in Spokane, Seattle, and Yakima, Washington. ANALYSIS: Transcriptions were coded using inductive methods. Coded statements were organized into major themes. Coding structures and analysis were strengthened by iterative interactions between researchers.

resultsParticipants reported Complete Eats Rx was an important resource for families and improved food security, diet quality, and the ability to purchase healthy foods, including a greater variety of fruits and vegetables. Primary barriers to food security and fruit and vegetable consumption included limited geographic accessibility and the high cost of fruits and vegetables, exacerbated by other financial constraints such as rising housing costs. Participants reported supermarket checkout difficulty because of embarrassment, stigmatization, and inability to redeem incentives. The most frequently mentioned barrier to perceived program acceptability was having only one supermarket chain as the acceptor of the incentive.

conclusionPartnering with supermarkets to accept fruit and vegetable incentives is a unique strategy to increase produce purchasing that can be adopted by other localities. Focus on geographic accessibility, appropriate price points, and positive shopping experiences via expansion to local grocers, improvements in staff interactions, and a transition to an electronic system may improve incentive redemption and usability.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceMotivationPerceptionConsumer BehaviorCosts and Cost AnalysisDiet, HealthyFemaleFood MarketsFood SecurityFood SupplyFruitHealth PromotionHumansMaleVegetablesWashingtonFood retailFruit and vegetable incentiveNutrition policyQualitative researchSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Identifiers

PMID33309590
PMCPMC9979618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.