Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33308893›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2021

Aging and Engaging: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Conversational Skills Coach for Older Adults.

Rafayet Ali, Ehsan Hoque, Paul Duberstein, Lenhart Schubert, Seyedeh Zahra Razavi, Benjamin Kane, Caroline Silva, Jennifer S Daks, Meghan Huang, Kim Van Orden

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Social Disconnection in Late Life Suicide: An NIMH Workshop on State of the Research in Identifying Mechanisms, Treatment Targets, and Interventions.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rafayet AliDepartment of Computer Science (RA, EH, LS, ZR, BK), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Ehsan HoqueDepartment of Computer Science (RA, EH, LS, ZR, BK), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Paul DubersteinDepartment of Health Behavior, Society & Policy (PD), Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ.
Lenhart SchubertDepartment of Computer Science (RA, EH, LS, ZR, BK), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Seyedeh Zahra RazaviDepartment of Computer Science (RA, EH, LS, ZR, BK), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Benjamin KaneDepartment of Computer Science (RA, EH, LS, ZR, BK), University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Caroline SilvaDepartment of Psychiatry (CS, KVO), University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Jennifer S DaksDepartment of Psychology (JSD, MH), University of Rochester , Rochester, NY.
Meghan HuangDepartment of Psychology (JSD, MH), University of Rochester , Rochester, NY.
Kim Van OrdenDepartment of Psychiatry (CS, KVO), University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: Kimberly_vanorden@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
Social Connections and Late Life SuicideK23MH096936 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI VAN ORDEN, KIMBERLY ALLISON · 2013 to 2016
$670k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH096936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCommunication difficulties negatively impact relationship quality and are associated with social isolation and loneliness in later life. There is a need for accessible communication interventions offered outside specialty mental health settings.

designPilot randomized controlled trial.

settingAssessments in the laboratory and intervention completed in-home.

participantsTwenty adults age 60 and older from the community and a geriatric psychiatry clinic.

interventionA web-based communication coach that provides automated feedback on eye contact, facial expressivity, speaking volume, and negative content (Aging and Engaging Program, AEP), delivered with minimal assistance in the home (eight brief sessions over 4-6 weeks) or control (education and videos on communication). MEASUREMENTS: System Usability Scale and Social Skills Performance Assessment, an observer-rated assessment of social communication elicited through standardized role-plays.

resultsNinety percent of participants completed all AEP sessions and the System Usability Scale score of 68 was above the cut-off for acceptable usability. Participants randomized to AEP demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in eye contact and facial expressivity.

conclusionThe AEP is acceptable and feasible for older adults with communication difficulties to complete at home and may improve eye contact and facial expressivity, warranting a larger RCT to confirm efficacy and explore potential applications to other populations, including individuals with autism and social anxiety.

Indexed as

CommunicationLonelinessAgedAgingHumansPilot ProjectsSocial Isolationartificial intelligenceinterventionSocial communicationsocial isolationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID33308893
PMCPMC8140061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.