Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33308427›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2021

Safety and immunogenicity of two novel type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine candidates compared with a monovalent type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine in children and infants: two clinical trials.

Xavier Sáez-Llorens, Ananda S Bandyopadhyay, Christopher Gast, Tirza De Leon, Rodrigo DeAntonio, Jose Jimeno, Maria Isabel Caballero, Gabriela Aguirre, M Steven Oberste, William C Weldon and 8 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02521974 phase4completednot on this map

A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 in Healthy Children Aged 1 to 5 Years and in bOPV-IPV Vaccinated Healthy Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorFidec CorporationRan2015 to 2016Enrolled164ConditionsAdverse Event Following ImmunisationArmsSABIN monovalent OPV2
NCT03554798 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Two Novel Oral Polio Type 2 (nOPV2) Vaccine Candidates in Healthy Children Aged 1 to 5 Years and in Healthy Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine-inactivated Polio Vaccine (bOPV-IPV) Vaccinated Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorFidec CorporationRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,025ConditionsPoliomyelitisArmsnOPV2 (monovalent oral polio vaccine)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Intestinal Mucosal Immune Responses to Novel Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Type 2 in Healthy Newborns.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Xavier Sáez-LlorensInfectious Disease Department, Hospital del Niño Dr José Renán Esquivel, Panama City, Panama; Sistema Nacional de Investigación, Senacyt, Panama.
Ananda S BandyopadhyayBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher GastPATH, Washington DC, USA.
Tirza De LeonCevaxin, David, Chiriqui, Panama.
Rodrigo DeAntonioSistema Nacional de Investigación, Senacyt, Panama; Cevaxin, Panama City, Panama.
Jose JimenoVaxTrials, Panama City, Panama.
Maria Isabel CaballeroVaxTrials, Panama City, Panama.
Gabriela AguirreFighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries, Miami, FL, USA.
M Steven ObersteDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William C WeldonDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jennifer L Konopka-AnstadtDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
John ModlinBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA; PATH, Washington DC, USA; Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA.
Novilia S BachtiarPT Bio Farma, Bandung, Indonesia.
Alan FixPATH, Washington DC, USA.
John KonzPATH, Washington DC, USA.
Ralf ClemensGlobal Research in Infectious Diseases, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sue Ann Costa ClemensInstitute for Global Health, Siena University, Siena, Italy.
Ricardo RüttimannFighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: rruttimann@fidec-online.org.
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USFighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USSecretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación · PAVaxTrials (Panama) · PABill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USPT Bio Farma (Indonesia) · IDUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinued emergence and spread of circulating vaccine-derived type 2 polioviruses and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis from Sabin oral poliovirus vaccines (OPVs) has stimulated development of two novel type 2 OPV candidates (OPV2-c1 and OPV2-c2) designed to have similar immunogenicity, improved genetic stability, and less potential to reacquire neurovirulence. We aimed to assess safety and immunogenicity of the two novel OPV candidates compared with a monovalent Sabin OPV in children and infants.

methodsWe did two single-centre, multi-site, partly-masked, randomised trials in healthy cohorts of children (aged 1-4 years) and infants (aged 18-22 weeks) in Panama: a control phase 4 study with monovalent Sabin OPV2 before global cessation of monovalent OPV2 use, and a phase 2 study with low and high doses of two novel OPV2 candidates. All participants received one OPV2 vaccination and subsets received two doses 28 days apart. Parents reported solicited and unsolicited adverse events. Type 2 poliovirus neutralising antibodies were measured at days 0, 7, 28, and 56, and stool viral shedding was assessed up to 28 days post-vaccination. Primary objectives were to assess safety in all participants and non-inferiority of novel OPV2 day 28 seroprotection versus monovalent OPV2 in infants (non-inferiority margin 10%). These studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02521974 and NCT03554798.

findingsThe control study took place between Oct 23, 2015, and April 29, 2016, and the subsequent phase 2 study between Sept 19, 2018, and Sept 30, 2019. 150 children (50 in the control study and 100 of 129 assessed for eligibility in the novel OPV2 study) and 684 infants (110 of 114 assessed for eligibility in the control study and 574 of 684 assessed for eligibility in the novel OPV2 study) were enrolled and received at least one study vaccination. Vaccinations were safe and well tolerated with no causally associated serious adverse events or important medical events in any group. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events were overwhelmingly mild or moderate irrespective of vaccine or dose. Nearly all children were seroprotected at baseline, indicating high baseline immunity. In children, the seroprotection rate 28 days after one dose was 100% for monovalent OPV2 and both novel OPV2 candidates. In infants at day 28, 91 (94% [95% CI 87-98]) of 97 were seroprotected after receiving monovalent OPV2, 134 (94% [88-97]) of 143 after high-dose novel OPV2-c1, 122 (93% [87-97]) of 131 after low-dose novel OPV2-c1, 138 (95% [90-98]) of 146 after high-dose novel OPV2-c2, and 115 (91% [84-95]) of 127 after low-dose novel OPV2-c2. Non-inferiority was shown for low-dose and high-dose novel OPV2-c1 and high-dose novel OPV2-c2 despite monovalent OPV2 recipients having higher baseline immunity.

interpretationBoth novel OPV2 candidates were safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in children and infants. Novel OPV2 could be an important addition to our resources against poliovirus given the current epidemiological situation.

fundingFighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantMalePanamaPoliomyelitisPoliovirusPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralVaccinationVirus SheddingAntibodies, ViralPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, Oral

Identifiers

PMID33308427
PMCPMC7811205
OpenAlexW4254537929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.