Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33308318›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Agitation, confusion, and aggression in critically ill traumatic brain injury-a pilot cohort study (ACACIA-PILOT).

David R Williamson, Sofia Ihsenne Cherifa, Anne Julie Frenette, Mar Saavedra Mitjans, Emmanuel Charbonney, Gabrielle Cataford, Virginie Williams, Julia Lainer Palacios, Lisa Burry, Sangeeta Mehta and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David R WilliamsonFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. david.williamson@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3360-4831
Sofia Ihsenne CherifaFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Anne Julie FrenetteFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Mar Saavedra MitjansFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Emmanuel CharbonneyResearch centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Gabrielle CatafordFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Virginie WilliamsResearch centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Julia Lainer PalaciosResearch centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Lisa BurryLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sangeeta MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Health System, and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline ArbourResearch centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Francis BernardResearch centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 34618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgitated behaviors are problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) as they create substantial risks and challenges for healthcare providers. To date, there have been no studies evaluating their epidemiology and impact in the ICU. Prior to planning a multicenter study, assessment of recruitment, feasibility, and pilot study procedures is needed. In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large multicenter prospective cohort study.

methodsThis feasibility study recruited adult patients admitted to the ICU with TBI and an abnormal cerebral CT scan. In all patients, we documented Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) and agitated behaviors every 8-h nursing shift using a dedicated tool documenting 14 behaviors. Our feasibility objectives were to obtain consent from at least 2 patients per month; completion of screening logs for agitated behaviors by bedside nurses for more than 90% of 8-h shifts; completion of data collection in an average of 6 h or less; and obtain 6-month follow-up for surviving patients. The main clinical outcome was the incidence of agitation and individual agitated behaviors.

resultsIn total, 47 eligible patients were approached for inclusion and 30 (64% consent rate) were recruited over a 10-month period (3 patients/month). In total, 794 out of 827 (96%) possible 8-h periods of agitated behavior logs were completed by bedside nurses, with a median of 24 observations (IQR 28.0) per patient. During the ICU stay, 17 of 30 patients developed agitation (56.7%; 95% CI 0.37-0.75) defined as RASS ≥ 2 during at least one observation period and for a median of 4 days (IQR 5.5). At 6 months post-TBI, among the 24 available patients, an unfavorable score (GOS-E < 5 including death) was reported in 12 patients (50%). In the 14 patients who were alive and available at 6 months, the median QOLIBRI score was 74.5 (IQR 18.5).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a larger cohort study to evaluate the epidemiology and impact of agitated behaviors in critically ill TBI patients. This study also shows that agitated behaviors are frequent and are associated with adverse events.

Indexed as

AggressivenessAgitationConfusionFeasibilityIntensive careTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33308318
PMCPMC7729148
OpenAlexW3112198800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.