Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33308234›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2020

The potential of real-time analytics to improve care for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: an early economic evaluation.

Lytske Bakker, Katerina Vaporidi, Jos Aarts, William Redekop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lytske BakkerErasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, P.O. Box 1738, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. bakker@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-0115
Katerina VaporidiDepartment of Intensive Care, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Jos AartsErasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, P.O. Box 1738, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
William RedekopErasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, P.O. Box 1738, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 644906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical ventilation services are an important driver of the high costs of intensive care. An optimal interaction between a patient and a ventilator is therefore paramount. Suboptimal interaction is present when patients repeatedly demand, but do not receive, breathing support from a mechanical ventilator (> 30 times in 3 min), also known as an ineffective effort event (IEEV). IEEVs are associated with increased hospital mortality prolonged intensive care stay, and prolonged time on ventilation and thus development of real-time analytics that identify IEEVs is essential. To assist decision-making about further development we estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of real-time analytics that identify ineffective effort events.

methodsWe developed a cost-effectiveness model combining a decision tree and Markov model for long-term outcomes with data on current care from a Greek hospital and literature. A lifetime horizon and a healthcare payer perspective were used. Uncertainty about the results was assessed using sensitivity and scenario analyses to examine the impact of varying parameters like the intensive care costs per day and the effectiveness of treatment of IEEVs.

resultsUse of the analytics could lead to reduced mortality (3% absolute reduction), increased quality adjusted life years (0.21 per patient) and cost-savings (€264 per patient) compared to current care. Moreover, cost-savings for hospitals and health improvements can be incurred even if the treatment's effectiveness is reduced from 30 to 10%. The estimated savings increase to €1,155 per patient in countries where costs of an intensive care day are high (e.g. the Netherlands). There is considerable headroom for development and the analytics generate savings when the price of the analytics per bed per year is below €7,307. Furthermore, even when the treatment's effectiveness is 10%, the probability that the analytics are cost-effective exceeds 90%.

conclusionsImplementing real-time analytics to identify ineffective effort events can lead to health and financial benefits. Therefore, it will be worthwhile to continue assessment of the effectiveness of the analytics in clinical practice and validate our findings. Eventually, their adoption in settings where costs of an intensive care day are high and ineffective efforts are frequent could yield a high return on investment.

Indexed as

Big data analyticsCost- effectiveness analysisIntensive care unitInteractive ventilator supportVentilation

Identifiers

PMID33308234
PMCPMC7729701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.