Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33308145›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Using occupational therapists in vocational clinics in primary care: a feasibility study.

Avril Drummond, Carolyn Coole, Fiona Nouri, Jo Ablewhite, Genevieve Smyth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fit notes: A call to arms.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Occupational therapy services in primary care: a scoping review.Primary health care research & development · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Avril DrummondSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. Avril.Drummond@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1220-8354
Carolyn CooleSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Fiona NouriSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Jo AblewhiteSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Genevieve SmythRoyal College of Occupational Therapists, 106-114 Borough High Street, London, SE1 1LB, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBRoyal College of Occupational Therapists · GB

Funding

Joint Work and Health Unit Challenge Fund grant CF\100261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGPs are under considerable pressure providing routine care. However, they may not be the most appropriate professionals to manage getting patients back to work, and keeping them there.

objectiveTo test the feasibility of delivering occupational therapy-led vocational clinics (OTVoc) to provide return to work advice and support for people with musculoskeletal conditions and mental health problems, in primary care.

methodsProspective mixed methods study in two primary care centres (eight GP surgeries). We collected anonymised service level data on all patients receiving OTVoc. Next, patient participants who met inclusion criteria and consented, undertook baseline and 3-month follow-up assessments. Interviews were also conducted to explore stakeholders' views- GPs, Nurse Practitioners, Front Desk Staff, Occupational Therapists, patients and their employers about OTVoc- and included study eligibility, referral, experiences and attitudes to return to work. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

resultsThe majority of standardized measures showed some improvement over the study period: the sickness absence rate dropped from 71 to 15% and use of GP 'fit' notes reduced from 76 to 6%. Interview data indicated positive attitudes to OTVoc, the use of the fit note and the Allied Health Professions Health and Work Reports (AHP H&WRs). GPs felt that OTVoc reduced their workload.

conclusionFurther research is feasible and warranted. OTVoc was positively received and stakeholders believed it was effective in getting patients back to work or preparing for their return. There was enthusiasm for extending service eligibility criteria, suggesting potential for further development and evaluation.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapistsSick LeaveFeasibility StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33308145
PMCPMC7734822
OpenAlexW3111937082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.