Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33308062›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

Reconciling competing mechanisms posited to underlie auditory verbal hallucinations.

Katharine N Thakkar, Daniel H Mathalon, Judith M Ford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Normative modeling of thalamic nuclear volumes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Biomarkers of Auditory-Verbal Hallucinations.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Perceptual pathways to hallucinogenesis.Schizophrenia research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Offline perception: an introduction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine N ThakkarDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Daniel H MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Judith M FordDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Predictive Coding Abnormalities in Psychosis: EEG and fMRIR01MH058262 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, JUDITH M · 1998 to 2018
$6.4M
Functional Brain Abnormalities in the Schizophrenia ProdromeR01MH076989 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHALON, DANIEL H · 2007 to 2014
$2.3M
Uncovering pathophysiological mechanisms of psychosis using the oculomotor system.R01MH112644 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THAKKAR, KATHARINE NATASHA · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
CSRD VA I01 CX000497CSRD VA IK6 CX002519NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058262NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076989NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception is not the passive registration of incoming sensory data. Rather, it involves some analysis by synthesis, based on past experiences and context. One adaptive consequence of this arrangement is imagination-the ability to richly simulate sensory experiences, interrogate and manipulate those simulations, in service of action and decision making. In this paper, we will discuss one possible cost of this adaptation, namely hallucinations-perceptions without sensory stimulation, which characterize serious mental illnesses like schizophrenia, but which also occur in neurological illnesses, and-crucially for the present piece-are common also in the non-treatment-seeking population. We will draw upon a framework for imagination that distinguishes voluntary from non-voluntary experiences and explore the extent to which the varieties and features of hallucinations map onto this distinction, with a focus on auditory-verbal hallucinations (AVHs)-colloquially, hearing voices. We will propose that sense of agency for the act of imagining is key to meaningfully dissecting different forms and features of AVHs, and we will outline the neural, cognitive and phenomenological sequelae of this sense. We will conclude that a compelling unifying framework for action, perception and belief-predictive processing-can incorporate observations regarding sense of agency, imagination and hallucination. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionHallucinationsHumansSchizophreniaagencyhallucinationsimaginationperceptionpsychosis

Identifiers

PMID33308062
PMCPMC7741078
OpenAlexW3113211370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.