Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33307242›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction2021

COVID-19 impact in abortions' practice, a regional French evaluation.

Karen Gibelin, Aubert Agostini, Michèle Marcot, Hélène Piclet, Florence Bretelle, Laura Miquel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safeguarding and teleconsultation for abortion.Lancet (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen GibelinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Pôle Femmes Parents Enfants, AP-HM La Conception University Hospital, 147 bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Aubert AgostiniDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Pôle Femmes Parents Enfants, AP-HM La Conception University Hospital, 147 bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.
Michèle MarcotMéditerranean Network, Périnatality South and Corse, Network, 13015, Marseille, France.
Hélène PicletDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Pôle Femmes Parents Enfants, AP-HM Hôpital Nord University Hospital, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Florence BretelleDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Pôle Femmes Parents Enfants, AP-HM La Conception University Hospital, 147 bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Pôle Femmes Parents Enfants, AP-HM Hôpital Nord University Hospital, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France.
Laura MiquelDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Pôle Femmes Parents Enfants, AP-HM La Conception University Hospital, 147 bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France. Electronic address: laura.miquel@ap-hm.fr.
Hôpital de la Conception · FRDélégation Provence et Corse · FRHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FRHôpital Nord · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOn March 14, 2020, France has entered into stage 3 of the COVID-19 pandemic. The French National Health Agency (Haute Autorité de Santé) has urgently recommended the use of medical abortion at home between 7 and 9 weeks of gestation and telemedicine for medical abortion consultations. The main objective of this study was to assess whether the emergency measures undertaken for the management of abortions during the COVID-19 pandemic led to practice changes, and to obtain practitioners' opinions regarding the continuation of these measures. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a retrospective, quantitative, online self-administered survey from August 6, 2020 to October 2, 2020, aimed at health workers performing abortions (midwives, general practitioners, gynecologists obstetricians and medical gynecologists) in the South and Corse regions in France.

resultsAmong the 124 practitioners included, 59/77 (76.6 %) offered medical abortion at home between 7 and 9 weeks of gestation and 61/89 (68.5 %) of them wished to carry on this practice. 55/123 (44.7 %) practitioners offered telemedicine for medical abortion at home and 71/115 (61.7 %) of them wished to carry on this practice. DISCUSSION: The emergency measures implemented by the the French National Health Agency (Haute Autorité de Santé) for medical abortion are approved and followed by the majority of health workers performing abortions in the South and Corse regions. This measure may be extended out of the COVID-19 epidemic.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAbortion, InducedAdultCOVID-19FemaleFranceGestational AgeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse MidwivesPandemicsPhysiciansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalCOVID-19Medical abortionTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33307242
PMCPMC7836690
OpenAlexW3111910859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.