ArticlePloS one2020
Online biology degree program broadens access for women, first-generation to college, and low-income students, but grade disparities remain.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond disability: how being twice-marginalized shapes the experiences of STEM undergraduates with disabilities.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- "Broadening Perspectives Activities" Improve LGBTQ+ Student Experiences and Religious Students' Content Comprehension.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- A Multi-institutional Cluster Analysis to Identify Groups of Courses with Exemplary Opportunity Gaps for Undergraduate Students in the Biological Sciences.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Design and implementation of an asynchronous online course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) in computational genomics.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Systemic advantage has a meaningful relationship with grade outcomes in students' early STEM courses at six research universities.International journal of STEM education · 2024Article
- How researchers calculate students' grade point average in other courses has minimal impact.PloS one · 2023Article
- A comparative case study of the accommodation of students with disabilities in online and in-person degree programs.PloS one · 2023Article
- A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2022Article
- The Experiences of Undergraduates with Depression in Online Science Learning Environments.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Anatomical self-efficacy of undergraduate students improves during a fully online biology course with at-home dissections.Advances in physiology education · 2022Article
- Aspects of online college science courses that alleviate and exacerbate undergraduate depression.PloS one · 2022Article
- Remote learning slightly decreased student performance in an introductory undergraduate course on climate change.Communications earth & environment · 2022Article
- Aspects of Large-Enrollment Online College Science Courses That Exacerbate and Alleviate Student Anxiety.CBE life sciences education · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and Undergraduates with Disabilities: Challenges Resulting from the Rapid Transition to Online Course Delivery for Students with Disabilities in Undergraduate STEM at Large-Enrollment Institutions.CBE life sciences education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Online education has grown rapidly in recent years with many universities now offering fully online degree programs even in STEM disciplines. These programs have the potential to broaden access to STEM degrees for people with social identities currently underrepresented in STEM. Here, we ask to what extent is that potential realized in terms of student enrollment and grades for a fully online degree program. Our analysis of data from more than 10,000 course-enrollments compares student demographics and course grades in a fully online biology degree program to demographics and grades in an equivalent in-person biology degree program at the same university. We find that women, first-generation to college students and students eligible for federal Pell grants constitute a larger proportion of students in the online program compared to the in-person mode. However, the online mode of instruction is associated with lower course grades relative to the in-person mode. Moreover, African American/Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American, and Pacific Islander students as well as federal Pell grant eligible students earned lower grades than white students and non-Pell grant eligible students, respectively, but the grade disparities were similar among both in-person and online student groups. Finally, we find that grade disparities between men and women are larger online compared to in-person, but that for first-generation to college women, the online mode of instruction is associated with little to no grade gap compared to continuing generation women. Our findings indicate that although this online degree program broadens access for some student populations, inequities in the experience remain and need to be addressed in order for online education to achieve its inclusive mission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.