ArticlePloS one2020
Population change and the burden of hospitalization in Germany 2000-2040: Decomposition analysis and projection.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- APOSCREEN-1 - a prospective, single-arm clinical trial for the implementation of a pharmacy-based screening for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic risk factors in Schleswig-Holstein.BMC nephrology · 2026Trial
- How does the level of care change after proximal humeral fracture in older patients? A propensity score matching analysis.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Population aging and changing hospitalization risks in Germany: a decomposition of changes in inpatient cases, 2005-2021.BMC public health · 2026Article
- [Challenges and potential of geriatric research in Germany-Insights from the GERisearch survey].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
- Emerging Trends in Patients Hospitalised With Cirrhosis-Aetiologies, Complications and Outcomes Compared to Other Chronic Health Conditions.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- The general health status of employees in Germany aged 45 to 59 years (Ü45-Check) - a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Patient- vs organ-based prognostic tools for older patients in critical care units : An observational study with a 3-month follow-up.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Observational
- Assistive technologies in healthcare: utilization and healthcare workers perceptions in Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Changing dynamics of bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Germany, 2017-2023: a continued burden of disease approach.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Position statement on genuine physiotherapy research at German university hospitals.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2024Article
- Addressing the Knowledge Deficit in Hospital Bed Planning and Defining an Optimum Region for the Number of Different Types of Hospital Beds in an Effective Health Care System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- [Conservative treatment of trauma-associated fractures of the cervical spine with orthoses-A review].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Modelling the effect of demographic change and healthcare infrastructure on the patient structure in German hospitals - a longitudinal national study based on official hospital statistics.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Developing and Establishing a Wound Dressing Team: Experience and Recommendations.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Preventive health examinations: protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study of German employees aged 45 to 59 years (Ü45-check).Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demographic factors, such as population aging and shrinkage, and non-demographic factors, such as hospitalization rate and length of hospital stay, generate challenges for inpatient care. This paper used decomposition analysis to assess how changes in these factors affected the number of hospital treatment days from 2000 to 2015 in Germany. Demographic aging was linked to increases in the number of treatment days for women (+10.0%) and men (+19.2%) and in hospitalization rates for women +6.0% and men +5.4%. However, these increases were offset by decreases in the number of hospital days (women: 16.5%; men: 7.3%) and length of stay (women: -27.4%; men -26.3%). For the projection up to 2040, 12 scenarios were developed (six for women and six for men) using three variants for future population demographics and two variants for future length of stay and hospitalization rates. One of the two variants for future length of stay and hospitalization rates provides for a constant value for the year 2015. For the second of these two variants variant, a logarithmic model was estimated on the basis of values from 2000 to 2015. and the trends were extrapolated using this model until 2040. The strongest overall predicted increase was 18.4% between 2015 and 2040, including a 22.4% increase for men. In two scenarios for women, only slight declines were predicted. All results, both for the decomposition analysis and projection, indicated a moderate but sustained effect of demographic aging on the number of hospital treatment days, leading to a significant increase in hospital treatment days over the study period. Non-demographic factors also had strong influences, especially in shorter time periods, but these effects offset each other over time. The change in the population size in the period under study had very little effect on the number of hospital treatment days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.