Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33306689›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Results of a person-centered maternal health quality improvement intervention in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Dominic Montagu, Katie Giessler, Michelle Kao Nakphong, Kali Prasad Roy, Ananta Basudev Sahu, Kovid Sharma, Cathy Green, May Sudhinaraset

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominic MontaguDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2477-5543
Katie GiesslerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Michelle Kao NakphongSchool of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2632-8007
Kali Prasad RoyPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Ananta Basudev SahuPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Kovid SharmaPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Cathy GreenIndependent Consultant, Cape Town, South Africa.
May SudhinarasetSchool of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR POPULATION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD007545 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ, Megan M Sweeney · 2001 to 2026
$4.1M
Gates Foundation INV-009179NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor patient experiences during delivery in Uttar Pradesh, India is a common problem. It delays presentation at facilities after the onset of labor and contributes to poor maternal health outcomes. Patient-centered maternity care (PCMC) is recognized by the World Health Organization as critical to overall quality. Changing PCMC requires changing the process of care, and is therefore especially challenging.

methodsWe used a matched case-control design to evaluate a quality improvement process directed at PCMC and based on widely established team-based methods used in many OECD countries. The intervention was introduced into three government facilities and teams supported to brainstorm and test improvements over 12 months. Progress was measured through pre-post interviews with new mothers, scored using a validated PCMC scale. Analysis included chi-squared and difference-in-difference tests.

findingsOn a scale to 100, the PCMC score of the intervention group increased 22.9 points compared to controls. Deliveries attended by midwives, dais, ASHAs or non-skilled providers resulted in significantly higher PCMC scores than those attended to by nurses or doctors. The intervention was associated with one additional visit from a doctor and over two additional visits from nurses per day, compared to the control group.

interpretationThis study has demonstrated the effectiveness of a team-based quality improvement intervention to ameliorate women's childbirth experiences. These improvements were locally designed and led, and offer a model for potential replication.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33306689
PMCPMC7732121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.