Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33306248›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2021

Adverse Events and Complications Associated With Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems: Insights From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Vasudha Goel, Yan Yang, Siddak Kanwar, Ratan K Banik, Amol M Patwardhan, Mohab Ibrahim, Eellan Sivanesan, Hariharan Shankar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vasudha GoelDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-1399
Yan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Siddak KanwarDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ratan K BanikDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Amol M PatwardhanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mohab IbrahimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Eellan SivanesanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hariharan ShankarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clement Zablocki VA Medical Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Arizona · USCleveland Clinic · USJohns Hopkins University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Validation of Spinal Neurotensin Receptor 2 as an Analgesic TargetR01NS116694 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PATWARDHAN, AMOL M · 2020 to 2025
$2.0M
Mechanism of intrathecal Contulakin-G induced analgesia without motor blockK08NS104272 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PATWARDHAN, AMOL M · 2018 to 2022
$987k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS104272NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are technologically advanced to deliver medication through various automated and patient-controlled programs. They also are associated with unique complications ranging from post-operative complications, medication-related adverse events (AE), device malfunction, to refill associated AE.

objectivesTo systematically analyze real-world complications and AE reported on the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database (MAUDE) associated with IDDS among patients predominantly with chronic pain disorders. MATERIALS AND

methodsMAUDE database was sampled for a month four times a year during the study period, February 2018 to February 2019. The database was resampled every six months till August 2020 to evaluate for any additional reported cases during the index months. The two FDA approved IDDS, were included. AE were broadly classified into causes related to catheter malfunction, pump malfunction, biologic, and medication-related AE.

resultsA total of 1001 reports were included in the final analysis. The top three reasons for adverse report are infection/erosion (15.7%, n = 157), motor stall (12.4%, n = 125) and adverse medication reactions (11.8%, n = 119), respectively. There were five deaths among patients with IDDS. Epidural hematoma (n = 3) after IDDS surgery resulted in a death and residual neurological deficits after surgical evacuation. Programming errors, medication concentration discrepancy, and failure to turn on the pump after reprogramming are various preventable causes of medication-related IDDS AEs.

conclusionsAnalysis of AE associated with IDDS from the MAUDE database provided a real-world perspective different from reported registry complications. Awareness and vigilance of preventable IDDS-related complications is the first step toward mitigating risks to provide safe and effective intrathecal drug delivery for chronic pain management.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsDatabases, FactualHumansChronic paincomplicationsFDAimplantable devicesintrathecal drug delivery system

Identifiers

PMID33306248
PMCPMC9034464
OpenAlexW3112720018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.