ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2021
Practical application of microsphere samples for benchmarking a quantitative phase imaging system.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label-free interferometry platform for drug response profiling of bioprinted tumor organoids at single-organoid resolution.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Bridging imaging-based in vitro methods from biomedical research to regulatory toxicology.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Drug screening at single-organoid resolution via bioprinting and interferometry.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Fabrication and validation of an LED array microscope for multimodal, quantitative imaging.HardwareX · 2023Article
- Interlaboratory evaluation of a digital holographic microscopy-based assay for label-free in vitro cytotoxicity testing of polymeric nanocarriers.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- Review
- Practical application of microsphere samples for benchmarking a quantitative phase imaging system.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) provides an approach for monitoring the dry mass of individual cells by measuring the optical pathlength of visible light as it passes through cells. A distinct advantage of QPI is that the measurements result in optical path length quantities that are, in principle, instrument independent. Reference materials that induce a well-defined optical pathlength shift and are compatible with QPI imaging systems will be valuable in assuring the accuracy of such measurements on different instruments. In this study, we evaluate seven combinations of microspheres embedded in index refraction matching media as candidate reference materials for benchmarking the performance of a QPI system and as calibration standards for the optical pathlength measurement. Poly(methyl metharylate) microspheres and mineral oil were used to evaluate the range of illumination apertures, signal-to-noise ratios, and focus positions that allow an accurate quantitative optical pathlength measurement. The microsphere-based reference material can be used to verify settings on an instrument that are suitable for obtaining an accurate pathlength measurement from biological cells. The microsphere/media reference material is applied to QPI-based dry mass measurements of a population of HEK293 cells to benchmark and provide evidence that the QPI image data are accurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.