ArticleESC heart failure2021
Predicting maximal oxygen uptake from the 6 min walk test in patients with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- The benefit of exercise rehabilitation guided by 6-minute walk test on lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective randomized controlled study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Trial
- Cross-Sectional Associations Between Skeletal Muscle Measurements, Myostatin, and MicroRNA-133a in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a regression equation for VO2 peak prediction in patients with heart and neurologic diseases.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Comparing hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses during six-minute walk and step tests in mild acute COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of clinical prediction models for cardiorespiratory fitness in atrial fibrillation patients following radiofrequency catheter ablation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Observational
- The Influence of Exercise on Cancer Risk, the Tumor Microenvironment and the Treatment of Cancer.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Article
- A Simple Equation to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Older Adults Using the 6 min Walk Test, Sex, Age and Body Mass Index.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of 6-min walk test distance vs. estimated maximum oxygen consumption for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Estimation of Functional Aerobic Capacity Using the Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Predicting maximal oxygen uptake from the 6 min walk test in patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Detection of Walk Tests in Free-Living Activities Using a Wrist-Worn Device.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsA cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) test is considered the gold standard in evaluating maximal oxygen uptake. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive validity of equations provided by Burr et al., Ross et al., Adedoyin et al., and Cahalin et al. in predicting peak VO METHODS AND
resultsNew York Heart Association Class I-III HF patients performed a maximal effort CPX test and two 6MWTs. Correlations between CPX VO
conclusionsThe equation provided by Cahalin et al. is simple and has a strong predictive validity, and researchers may use the equation to predict mean VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.