ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021
Usefulness of a Simple Preoperative Planning Technique using Plain X-rays for Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel iliofemoral classification for assessing surgical difficulty in direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Imaging of the Skeletal System: Overview of Applications in Human and Veterinary Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence-based three dimensional digital reconstruction technology in precision treatment of complex total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- How does the position of the pelvis and femur influence the selection of prosthesis size during 2D preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach: a systematic review comparing surgical approaches and strategies for prevention.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Flat-Panel Fluoroscopy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison to Image Intensifier Fluoroscopy With Radiopaque Grid.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Overall Accuracy of Radiological Digital Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Specialized Orthopaedics Hospital.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study at a minimum of 13 years follow-up.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of a simple preoperative planning technique using plain X-rays.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 96 consecutive cases of primary direct anterior approach (DAA)-total hip arthroplasty (THA) from July 2015 to December 2018 was performed. The 96 patients included 24 males and 72 females, with an average age of 70 years. The standard AP pelvis radiographs with the patients' hips extended and internally rotated were obtained pre- and postoperatively. The preoperative planning was also completed on the standardized AP pelvic radiographs. The prearranged cup positioning was radiologically measured intraoperatively using fluoroscopy. The correct leg length was assessed intraoperatively, which was compared with the preoperative planning. The component positioning was measured by three independent researchers. Two of the researchers completed the measurements three times, and intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were calculated. All patients received at least 6 months follow-up (6 months-4 years).
resultsIn all cases, the median leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 4.4 mm (range 1.6-15.9 mm), and 84 patients had an LLD smaller than 10 mm, of which 58 patients had an LLD of less than 5 mm. None of the patients had a critical LLD of 2 cm or larger. The multivariable logistic regression for LLD (safe range: yes/no) with the co-variables including gender, ASA classification, type of cup, the surgeon's experience level, and the presence of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) on the contralateral side did not present statistical significance. The median angle of the inclination of the acetabular component (IA) was 42.3° (range: 28.7°-52.2°). Ninety-one patients were within the defined safe range. The hit ratio for the cup to be within the safe zone was significantly higher for the Pinnacle cups than that for the Continuum cups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in gender, ASA classification, the surgeon's experience level, and the presence of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) on the contralateral side. The median of its anteversion (AA) was 20.6° (range: 10.6°-40.1°). Only 41 patients were within the defined safe range. None of the co-variables presented a statistical significance affecting the AA of the cup positioning. Meanwhile, the average fluoroscopy time for the cup positioning (n = 86, missing data in 10 cases) was 4 seconds (range: 1-74), with most of the patients (97.9%) having a fluoroscopy time of fewer than 20 seconds.
conclusionsThe combination of correct preoperative planning and standardized intraoperative measurements can reestablish right leg length and assure the correct cup positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.