Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33305367›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments.

Derek W Brown, Thomas J Greene, Michael D Swartz, Anna V Wilkinson, Stacia M DeSantis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Derek W BrownIntegrative Tumor Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8393-1713
Thomas J GreeneDivision of Biostatistics, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5108-713X
Michael D SwartzDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3953-8775
Anna V WilkinsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-8863
Stacia M DeSantisDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-1031
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USTexas Health and Science University · US

Funding

Training Program in Biostatistics at UTHSCH-SPHT32GM074902 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DESANTIS, STACIA · 2006 to 2018
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous treatments propensity scoring remains understudied as the majority of methods are focused on the binary treatment setting. Current propensity score methods for continuous treatments typically rely on weighting in order to produce causal estimates. It has been shown that in some continuous treatment settings, weighting methods can result in worse covariate balance than had no adjustments been made to the data. Furthermore, weighting is not always stable, and resultant estimates may be unreliable due to extreme weights. These issues motivate the current development of novel propensity score stratification techniques to be used with continuous treatments. Specifically, the generalized propensity score cumulative distribution function (GPS-CDF) and the nonparametric GPS-CDF approaches are introduced. Empirical CDFs are used to stratify subjects based on pretreatment confounders in order to produce causal estimates. A detailed simulation study shows superiority of these new stratification methods based on the empirical CDF, when compared with standard weighting techniques. The proposed methods are applied to the "Mexican-American Tobacco use in Children" study to determine the causal relationship between continuous exposure to smoking imagery in movies, and smoking behavior among Mexican-American adolescents. These promising results provide investigators with new options for implementing continuous treatment propensity scoring.

Indexed as

SmokingAdolescentCausalityChildComputer SimulationHumansPropensity Scorecausal inferencecontinuous treatmentobservational studypropensity scoresmoking initiation

Identifiers

PMID33305367
PMCPMC8629138
OpenAlexW3111159344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.